Skip to content

INCE vs TBFC

Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

INCEANYSE Arca

Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF

TBFCBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

INCE −0.15pt a year

INCE0.29%TBFC0.44%

Avg volume · 30D

INCE 21.7×the volume

INCE47.3KTBFC2.19K

INCE vs TBFC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+22.6%INCE+4.1%TBFC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. INCE +22.6%. TBFC +4.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
INCE 0.29%, better
TBFC 0.44%
Fund size
INCE $368M
TBFC $354M
1Y total return
INCE +22.6%, better
TBFC +4.1%
Yield (12M)
INCE 5.28%, better
TBFC 3.18%
Holdings
INCE 112
TBFC 27
Avg volume (30D)
INCE 47.3K sh, better
TBFC 2.19K sh
NAV per share
INCE $68.80
TBFC $28.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

INCE: Cost 82, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 74, Durability 85. TBFC: Cost 64, Risk 53, Mission 74, Tradability 49, Holdings 60, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for INCE, TBFC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarINCETBFC
Cost30% weightA82HigherB64
Mission25% weightNot scoredA74
Risk15% weightB64HigherC53
Tradability15% weightB65HigherC49
Holdings10% weightA74HigherB60
Durability5% weightA85HigherB67

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. INCE and TBFC are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 37 funds
See all 37 ›

INCE ranks 4th and TBFC 9th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 3AIRTRiShares LifePath Retirement ETFScore 86
  4. Rank 4AINCEFranklin Income Equity Focus ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 5AGAACambria Global Asset Allocation ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 8BGALState Street Global Allocation ETFScore 64
  7. Rank 9BTBFCBrinsmere Fund Conservative ETFScore 62
  8. Rank 10BDIALColumbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

INCEAFranklin Income Equity Focus ETF

TBFCBBrinsmere Fund Conservative ETF

In short

INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.

TBFC A conservative allocation fund that doesn't sit still: systematic models reset the blend of global stock and bond exposures on a set schedule, emerging markets included. Active management for 0.44%, below the typical allocation fund's fee.

Stated mandate

INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.

TBFC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while maintaining an approach consistent with capital preservation.

Why people hold it

  • INCE 0.29% a year, less than half what the typical allocation fund charges.
  • Income is the job, and it shows up monthly. The mandate also lets managers move across debt and equity markets rather than sit in one lane.
  • The stated goal is not yield alone: income, capital appreciation, and lower volatility than the S&P 500 are all written into the objective.
  • Undercuts its multi-asset sibling INCM (0.38%) on fee, and sits among the stronger names in a crowded allocation field.
  • TBFC Rules over hunches. The adviser's systematic models drive the asset mix, including a price-trend signal that raises or lowers international ex-US equity exposure rather than holding it at a fixed weight.sec.gov
  • 0.44%, with no fee waiver propping up the number, and below the median fee among the allocation funds we cover. Unusual pricing for an actively managed, multi-asset strategy.
  • One ticker, global reach: US, developed international and emerging market equity plus bond exposure, aimed at long-term appreciation in a way consistent with capital preservation.
  • Delivery matches the mandate closely, and the fund sits in the upper tier of a crowded allocation category on our review. Cash comes back quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • INCE Small and lightly traded next to the giants of its category, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the norm here.
  • Distributions may include return of capital, so part of a monthly payout can be your own money coming back.
  • Equity-forward by design. The aim is a smoother ride than the S&P 500, not bond-like steadiness.
  • TBFC You're paying for the overlay. Static index allocation funds like UCBG (0.06%) and IRTR (0.08%) hold set weights for a fraction of the cost.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's index giants, so spread and order type matter more than they would in a household-name allocation ETF.
  • Launched in 2024, so the models have a short live record, and a shifting mix means it can look quite different from a fixed 60/40 blend at any given time.

Full INCE profile⁠

Full TBFC profile⁠

INCE vs TBFC Holdings

How INCE and TBFC differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of INCE and 0.0% of TBFC.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors68.2%
  • Countryby domicile90.2%

Sector

Sector weights in INCE and TBFC, widest gap first
SectorMore in INCEMore in TBFC
TechnologyTBFC +21.7 points
UtilitiesINCE +11.1 points
Consumer StaplesINCE +9.8 points
EnergyINCE +5.7 points
Health CareINCE +4.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryTBFC +3.7 points
CommunicationTBFC +3.0 points
Real EstateTBFC +2.7 points
MaterialsINCE +1.1 points
FinancialsTBFC +0.7 points
IndustrialsINCE +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in INCE and TBFC, widest gap first
CountryMore in INCEMore in TBFC
United StatesINCE +6.3 points
JapanTBFC +2.2 points
FranceINCE +1.9 points
TaiwanTBFC +1.0 points
SwitzerlandINCE +1.0 points
CanadaTBFC +0.8 points
South KoreaTBFC +0.8 points
United KingdomINCE +0.6 points
Other countries (32)TBFC +5.0 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • INCE26.1%
  • TBFC71.3%

Securities held

  • INCE104
  • TBFC26

Asset class

INCE
Equity
TBFC
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in INCE104
  • In both0
  • Only in TBFC26

Only in INCE

104 securities, 98.7% of INCE by weight

  • Chevron Corp3.86%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co2.95%
  • Morgan Stanley Eln 10/272.87%

Only in TBFC

26 securities, 99.8% of TBFC by weight

  • Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF15.10%
  • iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF14.96%
  • Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF9.83%

Weight gaps

INCE and TBFC share no securities.

All 113 INCE holdings⁠All TBFC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

INCE vs TBFC Cost

Overpaying TBFC vs INCE

$2,900

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • INCE 0.29%

    $5,952

  • TBFC 0.44%

    $8,852

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • INCE 0.29%
  • TBFC 0.44%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530TBFC $8,852INCE $5,952

Year by year

YearINCETBFCOverpaying
10$527$794$267
20$2,044$3,061$1,017
30$5,952$8,852$2,900

Expense ratio

  • 0.29%INCE, cheaper
  • 0.44%TBFC
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.57%

INCE 7th cheapest of 37 funds

TBFC 14th cheapest of 37 funds

INCE vs TBFC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
INCE 5.28%, better
TBFC 3.18%
Payout (12M)
INCE $3.64
TBFC $0.91
Last payment
INCE $0.30
TBFC $0.21
Ex-dividend
INCE Oct 30, 2026
TBFC Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
INCE Pays Nov 4, 2026
TBFC Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
INCE Monthly
TBFC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

INCEMonthly · 34 paymentsAll INCE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2023 $0.12; Jun 16, 2023 $0.14; Sep 15, 2023 $0.24; Dec 15, 2023 $0.40; Mar 15, 2024 $0.16; Jun 28, 2024 $0.34; Jul 31, 2024 $0.17; Aug 30, 2024 $0.25; Sep 30, 2024 $0.20; Oct 31, 2024 $0.22; Nov 29, 2024 $0.23; Dec 31, 2024 $0.25; Jan 31, 2025 $0.20; Feb 28, 2025 $0.24; Mar 31, 2025 $0.27; Apr 30, 2025 $0.23; May 30, 2025 $0.27; Jun 30, 2025 $0.24; Jul 31, 2025 $0.21; Aug 29, 2025 $0.26; Sep 30, 2025 $0.29; Oct 31, 2025 $0.22; Nov 28, 2025 $0.23; Dec 30, 2025 $0.22; Jan 30, 2026 $0.29; Feb 27, 2026 $0.30; Mar 31, 2026 $0.35; Apr 30, 2026 $0.34; May 29, 2026 $0.25; Jun 30, 2026 $0.25; Jul 31, 2026 $0.30; Aug 31, 2026 $0.30; Sep 30, 2026 $0.30; Oct 30, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
TBFCQuarterly · 11 paymentsAll TBFC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2024 $0.08; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Sep 27, 2024 $0.19; Dec 30, 2024 $0.34; Mar 25, 2025 $0.14; Jun 24, 2025 $0.16; Sep 23, 2025 $0.18; Dec 31, 2025 $0.44; Mar 26, 2026 $0.08; Jun 25, 2026 $0.18; Sep 24, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

INCE vs TBFC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
INCE 10.8%TBFC 6.3%since Feb 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
INCE 1.28TBFC 0.54since Feb 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
INCE −18.4%TBFC −8.9%since Jan 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
INCE 0.60TBFC 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • INCEAvsUCBGA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBFCBvsUCBGA

    Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INCEAvsAOAA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBFCBvsAOAA

    Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INCEAvsIRTRA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBFCBvsIRTRA

    Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.