Skip to content

IRTR vs TBFC

iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

IRTRANYSE Arca

Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF

TBFCBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IRTR −0.36pt a year

IRTR0.08%TBFC0.44%

Avg volume · 30D

IRTR 5.8×the volume

IRTR12.7KTBFC2.19K

IRTR vs TBFC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.1%IRTR+4.1%TBFC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. IRTR +5.1%. TBFC +4.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IRTR 0.08%, better
TBFC 0.44%
Fund size
IRTR $60M
TBFC $354M
1Y total return
IRTR +5.1%, better
TBFC +4.1%
Yield (12M)
IRTR 3.17%
TBFC 3.18%, better
Holdings
IRTR 29140
TBFC 27
Avg volume (30D)
IRTR 12.7K sh, better
TBFC 2.19K sh
NAV per share
IRTR $31.52
TBFC $28.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IRTR: Cost 97, Risk 82, Mission 100, Tradability 62, Holdings 80, Durability 56. TBFC: Cost 64, Risk 53, Mission 74, Tradability 49, Holdings 60, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for IRTR, TBFC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIRTRTBFC
Cost30% weightA97HigherB64
Mission25% weightA100HigherA74
Risk15% weightA82HigherC53
Tradability15% weightB62HigherC49
Holdings10% weightA80HigherB60
Durability5% weightB56B67Higher

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IRTR and TBFC are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 37 funds
See all 37 ›

IRTR ranks 3rd and TBFC 9th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 3AIRTRiShares LifePath Retirement ETFScore 86
  4. Rank 4AINCEFranklin Income Equity Focus ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 8BGALState Street Global Allocation ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 9BTBFCBrinsmere Fund Conservative ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 10BDIALColumbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IRTRAiShares LifePath Retirement ETF

TBFCBBrinsmere Fund Conservative ETF

In short

IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.

TBFC A conservative allocation fund that doesn't sit still: systematic models reset the blend of global stock and bond exposures on a set schedule, emerging markets included. Active management for 0.44%, below the typical allocation fund's fee.

Stated mandate

IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.

TBFC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while maintaining an approach consistent with capital preservation.

Why people hold it

  • IRTR Costs 0.08% a year against a 0.78% median for allocation funds. Roughly a tenth of the going rate for a portfolio-in-a-box.
  • One line item, global coverage. The fund holds a spread of stock and bond ETFs across asset classes, so the mixing happens inside the wrapper.ishares.com
  • Distributions come monthly rather than quarterly.
  • One of the strongest all-in-one allocation funds in its peer group, and the cheapest of that top tier: iShares' own AOA runs 0.19%.
  • TBFC Rules over hunches. The adviser's systematic models drive the asset mix, including a price-trend signal that raises or lowers international ex-US equity exposure rather than holding it at a fixed weight.sec.gov
  • 0.44%, with no fee waiver propping up the number, and below the median fee among the allocation funds we cover. Unusual pricing for an actively managed, multi-asset strategy.
  • One ticker, global reach: US, developed international and emerging market equity plus bond exposure, aimed at long-term appreciation in a way consistent with capital preservation.
  • Delivery matches the mandate closely, and the fund sits in the upper tier of a crowded allocation category on our review. Cash comes back quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • IRTR Thinly traded. Spreads can run wider than on household-name ETFs, so limit orders matter more here.
  • Launched in 2023, so the track record is short and the fund is still building scale.
  • Conservative by construction: it is built to move less than an all-stock portfolio, and that cuts in both directions.ishares.com
  • TBFC You're paying for the overlay. Static index allocation funds like UCBG (0.06%) and IRTR (0.08%) hold set weights for a fraction of the cost.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's index giants, so spread and order type matter more than they would in a household-name allocation ETF.
  • Launched in 2024, so the models have a short live record, and a shifting mix means it can look quite different from a fixed 60/40 blend at any given time.

Full IRTR profile⁠

Full TBFC profile⁠

IRTR vs TBFC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IRTR vs TBFC Cost

Overpaying TBFC vs IRTR

$7,163

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IRTR 0.08%

    $1,689

  • TBFC 0.44%

    $8,852

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IRTR 0.08%
  • TBFC 0.44%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530TBFC $8,852IRTR $1,689

Year by year

YearIRTRTBFCOverpaying
10$147$794$647
20$575$3,061$2,486
30$1,689$8,852$7,163

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
  • 0.44%TBFC
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.57%

IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds

TBFC 14th cheapest of 37 funds

IRTR vs TBFC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IRTR 3.17%
TBFC 3.18%, better
Payout (12M)
IRTR $1.00
TBFC $0.91
Last payment
IRTR $0.08
TBFC $0.21
Ex-dividend
IRTR Oct 2, 2026
TBFC Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
IRTR Oct 7, 2026
TBFC Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
IRTR Monthly
TBFC Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

IRTRMonthly · 35 paymentsAll IRTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 35 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 4, 2023 $0.09; Dec 22, 2023 $0.37; Feb 2, 2024 $0.03; Mar 4, 2024 $0.04; Apr 2, 2024 $0.07; May 2, 2024 $0.06; Jun 4, 2024 $0.06; Jul 2, 2024 $0.12; Aug 2, 2024 $0.07; Sep 4, 2024 $0.05; Oct 2, 2024 $0.08; Nov 4, 2024 $0.69; Dec 3, 2024 $0.05; Dec 20, 2024 $0.17; Feb 4, 2025 $0.05; Mar 4, 2025 $0.05; Apr 2, 2025 $0.09; May 2, 2025 $0.06; Jun 3, 2025 $0.06; Jul 2, 2025 $0.14; Aug 4, 2025 $0.06; Sep 3, 2025 $0.06; Oct 2, 2025 $0.08; Nov 4, 2025 $0.06; Dec 2, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.17; Feb 3, 2026 $0.05; Mar 3, 2026 $0.05; Apr 2, 2026 $0.07; May 4, 2026 $0.07; Jun 2, 2026 $0.08; Jul 2, 2026 $0.16; Aug 4, 2026 $0.08; Sep 2, 2026 $0.06; Oct 2, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
TBFCQuarterly · 11 paymentsAll TBFC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2024 $0.08; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Sep 27, 2024 $0.19; Dec 30, 2024 $0.34; Mar 25, 2025 $0.14; Jun 24, 2025 $0.16; Sep 23, 2025 $0.18; Dec 31, 2025 $0.44; Mar 26, 2026 $0.08; Jun 25, 2026 $0.18; Sep 24, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

IRTR vs TBFC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IRTR 7.3%TBFC 6.3%since Feb 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IRTR 1.14TBFC 0.54since Feb 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IRTR −6.3%since Oct 2023TBFC −8.9%since Jan 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IRTR 0.47TBFC 0.47Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • IRTRAvsUCBGA

    iShares LifePath Retirement ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBFCBvsUCBGA

    Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IRTRAvsAOAA

    iShares LifePath Retirement ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBFCBvsAOAA

    Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IRTRAvsINCEA

    iShares LifePath Retirement ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBFCBvsINCEA

    Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.