TRFM ranks 3rd and INVN 10th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
INVN vs TRFM
TRFM −0.06pt a year
0.55%0.49%
TRFM 9.8×the volume
4.11K40.1K
INVN vs TRFM Performance
+26.4%+5.8%
- INVN 0.55%
- TRFM 0.49%, better
- INVN $11M
- TRFM $313M
- INVN +26.4%, better
- TRFM +5.8%
- INVN 52
- TRFM 266
- INVN 4.11K sh
- TRFM 40.1K sh, better
- INVN $26.75
- TRFM $53.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INVN | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A81Higher |
| Mission | F12 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | F18 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A76 | A89Higher |
| Durability | D37 | C50Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. INVN and TRFM are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INVNB
TRFMA
In short
INVN Most innovation funds buy the story. INVN buys the R&D line: it ranks Russell 1000 companies by research spending against enterprise value, screens for profitability first, then equal-weights the top 50 and re-sorts every quarter.
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
Stated mandate
INVN The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Alger Russell Innovation Index.
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INVN vs TRFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INVN vs TRFM Cost
Overpaying INVN vs TRFM
$1,112
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INVN 0.55%
$10,904
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INVN | TRFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $883 | $105 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $3,394 | $396 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $9,792 | $1,112 |
- 0.55%INVN
- 0.49%TRFM, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
INVN 10th cheapest of 30 funds
INVN vs TRFM Dividends
- INVN $0.06
- TRFM $0.08
- INVN Dec 18, 2025
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- INVN Dec 31, 2025
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- INVN Irregular
- TRFM Irregular
Distribution history
INVN vs TRFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INVN 21.1%TRFM 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- INVN 0.60TRFM 1.02
- Worst fall
- INVN −38.0%TRFM −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- INVN 0.92TRFM 1.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.