XITK ranks 4th and INVN 10th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
INVN vs XITK
XITK −0.10pt a year
0.55%0.45%
INVN 1.9×the volume
4.11K2.15K
INVN vs XITK Performance
+26.4%+0.6%
- INVN 0.55%
- XITK 0.45%, better
- INVN $11M
- XITK $67M
- INVN +26.4%, better
- XITK +0.6%
- INVN
- XITK 0.00%
- INVN 52
- XITK 95
- INVN 4.11K sh, better
- XITK 2.15K sh
- INVN $26.75
- XITK $197.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INVN | XITK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A95Higher |
| Mission | F12 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | F18 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A76 | A81Higher |
| Durability | D37 | A73Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. INVN and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INVNB
XITKA
In short
INVN Most innovation funds buy the story. INVN buys the R&D line: it ranks Russell 1000 companies by research spending against enterprise value, screens for profitability first, then equal-weights the top 50 and re-sorts every quarter.
XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.
Stated mandate
INVN The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Alger Russell Innovation Index.
XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INVN vs XITK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INVN vs XITK Cost
Overpaying INVN vs XITK
$1,863
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INVN 0.55%
$10,904
XITK 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INVN | XITK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $812 | $176 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $3,128 | $662 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $9,041 | $1,863 |
- 0.55%INVN
- 0.45%XITK, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
INVN 10th cheapest of 30 funds
INVN vs XITK Dividends
- INVN
- XITK 0.00%
- INVN
- XITK None
- INVN $0.06
- XITK
- INVN Dec 18, 2025
- XITK
- INVN Dec 31, 2025
- XITK
- INVN Irregular
- XITK
Distribution history
INVN vs XITK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INVN 21.1%XITK 25.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- INVN 0.60XITK 0.63
- Worst fall
- INVN −38.0%XITK −61.4%
- Market sensitivity
- INVN 0.92XITK 1.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.