Skip to content

IYM vs VAW

iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF

IYMBNYSE Arca

Vanguard Materials ETF

VAWBNYSE Arca

Overlap

62.7%by weight

Expense ratio

VAW −0.28pt a year

IYM0.37%VAW0.09%

Avg volume · 30D

IYM 3.1×the volume

IYM198KVAW64.4K

10Y return · a year

IYM +0.5pt

IYM+10.6%VAW+10.1%

IYM vs VAW Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+46.1%IYM+34.0%VAW

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IYM +46.1%. VAW +34.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IYM 0.37%
VAW 0.09%, better
Fund size
IYM $1.28B
VAW $4.5B
1Y total return
IYM +27.6%, better
VAW +18.9%
Yield (12M)
IYM 1.28%
VAW 1.39%, better
Holdings
IYM 43
VAW 113
Avg volume (30D)
IYM 198K sh, better
VAW 64.4K sh
NAV per share
IYM $179.54
VAW $228.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IYM: Cost 50, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 32, Durability 74. VAW: Cost 84, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 50, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for IYM, VAW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIYMVAW
Cost30% weightC50A84Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB67HigherB60
Tradability15% weightB67HigherC42
Holdings10% weightD32C50Higher
Durability5% weightA74A86Higher

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IYM and VAW are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

VAW ranks 3rd and IYM 5th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BVAWVanguard Materials ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BXMEState Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 5BIYMiShares U.S. Basic Materials ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 6CMXIiShares Global Materials ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IYMBiShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF

VAWBVanguard Materials ETF

In short

IYM A materials-sector original from June 2000, re-engineered in 2021 around a capped Russell 1000 index: roughly 40 U.S. chemical, metals and mining, and packaging names, with mid caps sitting beside the giants.

VAW Vanguard's materials aisle in one ticker: chemicals, packaging and metals, roughly 120 names deep, for 0.09% a year while the category norm sits several times higher.

Stated mandate

IYM The fund seeks to track an index composed of U.S. equities in the basic materials sector.

VAW The fund seeks to track a materials-sector equity benchmark through passive indexing and normally invests at least 80% of assets in the benchmark's stocks.

Why people hold it

  • IYM Launched June 2000, it has traded through a quarter century of commodity cycles and is a billion-dollar-plus fund today.blackrock.com
  • The index caps any single issuer at 22.5%, and all names above 4.5% at 45% combined, reset each quarterly rebalance, so one chemical giant cannot swallow the portfolio.blackrock.comsec.gov
  • Built from the Russell 1000, so mid caps qualify alongside the mega caps: roughly 40 holdings across metals, chemicals and forestry products. Pays quarterly.sec.govishares.com
  • VAW Charges 0.09% a year, several times below the median for broad materials funds. Cheap enough that cost stops being the argument.
  • Holds about 120 stocks from MSCI's US Investable Market materials index, so it reaches down the cap ladder instead of stopping at the biggest names.
  • Plain passive indexing, at least 80% in benchmark stocks, and it has tracked that benchmark closely. One of the stronger builds in the materials group.
  • Trading since 2004 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, run by Vanguard's index desk. Distributions arrive quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • IYM At 0.37% with no waiver, the fee lands near the category median, but XLB (0.08%), FMAT (0.084%) and VAW (0.09%) cover the same sector for a sliver of that.
  • Materials is a cyclical corner: results track commodity prices and global industrial demand, and with roughly 40 names, single-stock news lands hard.ishares.com
  • Trading is moderate rather than heavy for the category, so spreads and order type matter more than with the most heavily traded sector funds.
  • VAW One sector, and a cyclical one. Chemicals, miners and packagers ride construction and industrial demand, so swings run wider than a total-market fund.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can widen in fast markets.
  • XLB and FMAT sit a basis point lower at 0.08%. A rounding error, but it exists.

Full IYM profile⁠

Full VAW profile⁠

IYM vs VAW Holdings

How IYM and VAW differ

Overlap by weight

62.7%

Shared holdings make up 84.5% of IYM and 65.5% of VAW.

Level by level

  • Holdings30 in both62.7%
  • Sector6 Sectors89.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.8%

Sector

Sector weights in IYM and VAW, widest gap first
SectorMore in IYMMore in VAW
IndustrialsIYM +10.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryVAW +6.2 points
MaterialsVAW +3.5 points
Health CareVAW +0.5 points
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IYM and VAW, widest gap first
CountryMore in IYMMore in VAW
United StatesVAW +0.2 points
CanadaIYM +0.2 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • IYM68.8%
  • VAW58.0%

Securities held

  • IYM40
  • VAW111

Asset class

IYM
Equity
VAW
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in IYM10
  • In both30
  • Only in VAW81

Only in IYM

10 securities, 15.4% of IYM by weight

  • Fastenal4.54%
  • Anglogold Ashanti PLC3.09%
  • Southern Copper Corp1.72%

Only in VAW

81 securities, 34.3% of VAW by weight

  • Sherwin-Williams Co/The5.13%
  • Crh PLC3.85%
  • Vulcan Materials Co2.21%

Weight gaps

All 30 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in IYM and VAW, widest gap first
HoldingMore in IYMMore in VAW
Linde PLCLINIYM +5.78 points
CortevaCTVAVAW +2.79 points
EcolabECLIYM +1.96 points
NewmontNEMIYM +1.53 points
Steel Dynamics IncSTLDIYM +1.10 points
International Flavors & FragrancesIFFIYM +1.03 points
Air Products and ChemicalsAPDIYM +1.00 points
Freeport Mcmoran IncFCXIYM +1.00 points

All 40 IYM holdings⁠All 115 VAW holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IYM vs VAW Cost

Overpaying IYM vs VAW

$5,615

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IYM 0.37%

    $7,513

  • VAW 0.09%

    $1,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IYM 0.37%
  • VAW 0.09%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530IYM $7,513VAW $1,898

Year by year

YearIYMVAWOverpaying
10$670$165$505
20$2,590$646$1,944
30$7,513$1,898$5,615

Expense ratio

  • 0.37%IYM
  • 0.09%VAW, cheaper
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

VAW 3rd cheapest of 14 funds

IYM 7th cheapest of 14 funds

IYM vs VAW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IYM 1.28%
VAW 1.39%, better
Payout (12M)
IYM $2.30
VAW $3.18
Last payment
IYM $0.59
VAW $0.78
Ex-dividend
IYM Sep 15, 2026
VAW Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
IYM Sep 18, 2026
VAW Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
IYM Quarterly
VAW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.24; Jun 27, 2017 $0.42; Sep 26, 2017 $0.46; Dec 19, 2017 $0.35; Mar 22, 2018 $0.33; Jun 26, 2018 $0.44; Sep 26, 2018 $0.35; Dec 17, 2018 $0.30; Mar 20, 2019 $0.40; Jun 17, 2019 $0.53; Sep 24, 2019 $0.50; Dec 16, 2019 $0.62; Mar 25, 2020 $0.34; Jun 15, 2020 $0.41; Sep 23, 2020 $0.41; Dec 14, 2020 $0.42; Mar 25, 2021 $0.42; Jun 10, 2021 $0.44; Sep 24, 2021 $0.52; Dec 13, 2021 $0.70; Mar 24, 2022 $0.42; Jun 9, 2022 $0.83; Sep 26, 2022 $0.72; Dec 13, 2022 $0.71; Mar 23, 2023 $0.46; Jun 7, 2023 $0.53; Sep 26, 2023 $0.73; Dec 20, 2023 $0.73; Mar 21, 2024 $0.46; Jun 11, 2024 $0.50; Sep 25, 2024 $0.61; Dec 17, 2024 $0.57; Mar 18, 2025 $0.48; Jun 16, 2025 $0.47; Sep 16, 2025 $0.62; Dec 16, 2025 $0.76; Mar 17, 2026 $0.47; Jun 15, 2026 $0.49; Sep 15, 2026 $0.59. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VAWQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VAW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.50; Jun 28, 2017 $0.55; Sep 27, 2017 $0.61; Dec 14, 2017 $0.57; Mar 16, 2018 $0.37; Jun 28, 2018 $0.66; Sep 24, 2018 $0.59; Dec 13, 2018 $0.63; Mar 21, 2019 $0.57; Jun 21, 2019 $0.70; Sep 26, 2019 $0.63; Dec 16, 2019 $0.69; Mar 10, 2020 $0.54; Jun 22, 2020 $0.67; Sep 11, 2020 $0.59; Dec 17, 2020 $0.82; Mar 26, 2021 $0.56; Jun 21, 2021 $0.66; Sep 29, 2021 $0.80; Dec 16, 2021 $0.83; Mar 24, 2022 $0.64; Jun 23, 2022 $0.98; Sep 28, 2022 $0.79; Dec 15, 2022 $0.95; Mar 24, 2023 $0.68; Jun 29, 2023 $0.83; Sep 28, 2023 $0.86; Dec 19, 2023 $0.89; Mar 22, 2024 $0.68; Jun 28, 2024 $0.82; Sep 27, 2024 $0.84; Dec 18, 2024 $0.86; Mar 25, 2025 $0.83; Jun 26, 2025 $0.82; Sep 24, 2025 $0.77; Dec 17, 2025 $0.81; Mar 24, 2026 $0.79; Jun 24, 2026 $0.80; Sep 23, 2026 $0.78. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

IYM vs VAW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IYM
  • VAW
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: IYM −29.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IYM 17.7%VAW 17.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IYM 0.65, betterVAW 0.54
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IYM −29.9%VAW −25.5%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IYM 0.88VAW 0.98

Popular comparisons

  • IYMBvsXLBA

    iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VAWBvsXLBA

    Vanguard Materials ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYMBvsFMATA

    iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VAWBvsFMATA

    Vanguard Materials ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IYMBvsXMEB

    iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VAWBvsXMEB

    Vanguard Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.