XME ranks 4th and IYM 5th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
IYM vs XME
XME −0.02pt a year
0.37%0.35%
XME 9.3×the volume
198K1.83M
XME +5.2pt
+10.6%+15.8%
IYM vs XME Performance
+46.1%+134.2%
- IYM 0.37%
- XME 0.35%, better
- IYM $1.28B
- XME $3.84B
- IYM +27.6%, better
- XME +1.6%
- IYM 1.28%, better
- XME 0.35%
- IYM 43
- XME 39
- IYM 198K sh
- XME 1.83M sh, better
- IYM $179.54
- XME $101.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IYM | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | B61Higher |
| Mission | C52 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B67 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | B67Higher |
| Durability | A74Higher | A70 |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. IYM and XME are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IYMB
XMEB
In short
IYM A materials-sector original from June 2000, re-engineered in 2021 around a capped Russell 1000 index: roughly 40 U.S. chemical, metals and mining, and packaging names, with mid caps sitting beside the giants.
XME Not the chemicals-heavy materials fund. XME holds roughly 40 miners and steelmakers on a modified equal weight, so a small copper name carries about the weight of a giant. Ore, coal and metal, since 2006.
Stated mandate
IYM The fund seeks to track an index composed of U.S. equities in the basic materials sector.
XME The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IYM vs XME Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IYM vs XME Cost
Overpaying IYM vs XME
$387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IYM 0.37%
$7,513
XME 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IYM | XME | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $634 | $36 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $2,454 | $136 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $7,126 | $387 |
- 0.37%IYM
- 0.35%XME, cheaper
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XME 6th cheapest of 14 funds
IYM 7th cheapest of 14 funds
IYM vs XME Dividends
- IYM 1.28%, better
- XME 0.35%
- IYM $2.30
- XME $0.34
- IYM $0.59
- XME $0.07
- IYM Sep 15, 2026
- XME Sep 21, 2026
- IYM Sep 18, 2026
- XME Sep 23, 2026
- IYM Quarterly
- XME Quarterly
Distribution history
IYM vs XME Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IYM
- XME
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IYM 17.7%, betterXME 29.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IYM 0.65XME 0.79, better
- Worst fall
- IYM −29.9%, betterXME −37.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IYM 0.88XME 1.32
IYM and XME in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
