QEMM ranks 4th and JHEM 12th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
JHEM vs QEMM
QEMM −0.19pt a year
0.49%0.30%
JHEM 15.6×the volume
59.5K3.81K
JHEM +0.4pt
+7.2%+6.8%
JHEM vs QEMM Performance
+41.7%+38.7%
- JHEM 0.49%
- QEMM 0.30%, better
- JHEM $887M
- QEMM $54M
- JHEM +16.6%
- QEMM +18.4%, better
- JHEM 1.91%
- QEMM 4.62%, better
- JHEM 891
- QEMM 836
- JHEM 59.5K sh, better
- QEMM 3.81K sh
- JHEM $36.19
- QEMM $73.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JHEM | QEMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | C51Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | B59Higher | B55 |
| Durability | B59Higher | C52 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. JHEM and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JHEMC
QEMMB
In short
JHEM Dimensional designs the index, John Hancock wraps it in an ETF: roughly 900 emerging-market stocks, sorted country by country toward cheaper, more profitable, smaller companies. Fee is 0.49%, net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
JHEM The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, investment results that closely correspond to the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index.
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JHEM vs QEMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JHEM vs QEMM Cost
Overpaying JHEM vs QEMM
$3,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JHEM 0.49%
$9,792
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JHEM | QEMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $545 | $338 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $2,113 | $1,281 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $6,149 | $3,643 |
- 0.49%JHEM
- 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
JHEM 14th cheapest of 20 funds
JHEM vs QEMM Dividends
- JHEM 1.91%
- QEMM 4.62%, better
- JHEM $0.71
- QEMM $3.52
- JHEM $0.20
- QEMM $1.05
- JHEM Jun 26, 2026
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- JHEM Jun 30, 2026
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- JHEM Twice a year
- QEMM Twice a year
Distribution history
JHEM vs QEMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JHEM
- QEMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JHEM 15.3%QEMM 13.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JHEM 0.99QEMM 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- JHEM −29.1%QEMM −27.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JHEM 1.11QEMM 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.