TRFM ranks 3rd and KNO 19th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
KNO vs TRFM
TRFM −0.26pt a year
0.75%0.49%
TRFM 63.8×the volume
62840.1K
KNO vs TRFM Performance
+26.1%+5.8%
- KNO 0.75%
- TRFM 0.49%, better
- KNO $43M
- TRFM $313M
- KNO +26.1%, better
- TRFM +5.8%
- KNO 0.88%
- TRFM
- KNO 86
- TRFM 266
- KNO 628 sh
- TRFM 40.1K sh, better
- KNO $63.57
- TRFM $53.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KNO | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A81Higher |
| Mission | B55 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | F8 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B55Higher | C50 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. KNO and TRFM are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KNOC
TRFMA
In short
KNO Most innovation ETFs buy US tech stories. KNO rebuilds the books instead, treating R&D, brand and training spend as investment, then buying the developed-market companies that rank highest on that knowledge capital.
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
Stated mandate
KNO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equities of highly innovative knowledge-leader companies. It uses a proprietary quantitative screen emphasizing intangible-adjusted innovation intensity, financial strength, profitability, research and development, earnings growth, and operating cash flow.
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KNO vs TRFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KNO vs TRFM Cost
Overpaying KNO vs TRFM
$4,690
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KNO 0.75%
$14,482
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KNO | TRFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $883 | $453 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,394 | $1,684 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,792 | $4,690 |
- 0.75%KNO
- 0.49%TRFM, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
KNO 20th cheapest of 30 funds
KNO vs TRFM Dividends
- KNO 0.88%
- TRFM
- KNO $0.55
- TRFM
- KNO $0.55
- TRFM $0.08
- KNO Dec 23, 2025
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- KNO Dec 26, 2025
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- KNO Annual
- TRFM Irregular
Distribution history
KNO vs TRFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KNO 14.5%, betterTRFM 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- KNO 1.11, betterTRFM 1.02
- Worst fall
- KNO −33.6%TRFM −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- KNO 1.09TRFM 1.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.