Skip to content

KNO vs XITK

AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF

KNOCNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XITK −0.30pt a year

KNO0.75%XITK0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

XITK 3.4×the volume

KNO628XITK2.15K

10Y return · a year

XITK +2.8pt

KNO+10.1%XITK+12.9%

KNO vs XITK Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+39.7%KNO−17.4%XITK

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. KNO +39.7%. XITK −17.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KNO 0.75%
XITK 0.45%, better
Fund size
KNO $43M
XITK $67M
1Y total return
KNO +26.1%, better
XITK +0.6%
Yield (12M)
KNO 0.88%, better
XITK 0.00%
Holdings
KNO 86
XITK 95
Avg volume (30D)
KNO 628 sh
XITK 2.15K sh, better
NAV per share
KNO $63.57
XITK $197.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KNO: Cost 22, Risk 92, Mission 55, Tradability 8, Holdings 65, Durability 55. XITK: Cost 95, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 81, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for KNO, XITK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKNOXITK
Cost30% weightF22A95Higher
Mission25% weightB55Not scored
Risk15% weightA92HigherD37
Tradability15% weightF8B65Higher
Holdings10% weightB65A81Higher
Durability5% weightB55A73Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KNO and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XITK ranks 4th and KNO 19th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 4AXITKState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 5AGINNGoldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETFScore 70
  6. Rank 19CARKKARK Innovation ETFScore 41
  7. Rank 19CKNOAXS Knowledge Leaders ETFScore 41
  8. Rank 21CSOCLGlobal X Social Media ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KNOCAXS Knowledge Leaders ETF

XITKAState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

In short

KNO Most innovation ETFs buy US tech stories. KNO rebuilds the books instead, treating R&D, brand and training spend as investment, then buying the developed-market companies that rank highest on that knowledge capital.

XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.

Stated mandate

KNO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equities of highly innovative knowledge-leader companies. It uses a proprietary quantitative screen emphasizing intangible-adjusted innovation intensity, financial strength, profitability, research and development, earnings growth, and operating cash flow.

XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.

Why people hold it

  • KNO The mechanism is the point: spending on R&D, advertising, brand and employee training is treated as capital, not expense, surfacing innovators the usual tech screens miss.axsinvestments.com
  • All-sector and global by design, spanning North America, Europe and Asia, which is unusual in a category that leans heavily on US technology names.axsinvestments.com
  • Innovation is not the only test. The screen also weighs profitability, financial strength, earnings growth and operating cash flow.
  • Live since 2015 under its original Knowledge Leaders name before AXS took it over in 2024, so this is a long-running approach, not a freshly minted theme.prnewswire.com
  • XITK Costs 0.45% a year, comfortably under the 0.65% median for disruptive-innovation funds, and it does it inside a plain index wrapper from a major ETF shop.
  • Equal weighting at each reset gives the hundredth holding the same slot as the first, so results lean on the whole basket rather than two or three mega-caps.factset.com
  • Screens segments, not slogans: only companies drawing most of their revenue from the fastest-growing corners of tech and electronic media make the cut.factset.comssga.com
  • Trading since 2016, giving it a live record across several tech cycles, and it sits in the upper tier of our innovation-fund cohort review.

Worth knowing

  • KNO The 0.75% fee sits above the category median across the 31 innovation funds we track, and above peers like KOMP at 0.20% and XT at 0.46%.
  • Among the smaller and more lightly traded funds in its group, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads and more price impact on bigger orders.
  • Actively managed on a proprietary screen and measured against a broad equal-weighted world index, so the portfolio can look nothing like a US tech fund.sec.gov
  • XITK Growth-screened tech, equal-weighted, means smaller names carry a giant's weight. Expect a rougher ride than a cap-weighted tech fund.
  • Thinly traded for its category and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the household-name tech ETFs.
  • Cheaper shelfmates exist: KOMP runs a broad new-economy basket for 0.20%.

Full KNO profile⁠

Full XITK profile⁠

KNO vs XITK Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KNO vs XITK Cost

Overpaying KNO vs XITK

$5,441

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KNO 0.75%

    $14,482

  • XITK 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KNO 0.75%
  • XITK 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530KNO $14,482XITK $9,041

Year by year

YearKNOXITKOverpaying
10$1,336$812$524
20$5,078$3,128$1,950
30$14,482$9,041$5,441

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%KNO
  • 0.45%XITK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds

KNO 20th cheapest of 30 funds

KNO vs XITK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KNO 0.88%, better
XITK 0.00%
Payout (12M)
KNO $0.55
XITK None
Last payment
KNO $0.55
XITK No data
Ex-dividend
KNO Dec 23, 2025
XITK No data
Paid on
KNO Dec 26, 2025
XITK No data
Frequency
KNO Annual
XITK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KNOAnnual · 9 paymentsAll KNO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.23; Dec 24, 2018 $0.29; Dec 23, 2019 $0.36; Dec 23, 2020 $0.26; Dec 22, 2021 $0.23; Dec 21, 2022 $0.66; Dec 20, 2023 $0.56; Dec 23, 2024 $0.68; Dec 23, 2025 $0.55. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
XITK9 paymentsAll XITK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2017 $1.36; Dec 24, 2018 $1.24; Dec 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.13; Jun 21, 2022 $0.06; Sep 19, 2022 $0.05; Jun 20, 2023 $0.0071; Sep 18, 2023 $0.0094; Dec 18, 2023 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

KNO vs XITK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KNO
  • XITK
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XITK −61.4% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KNO 14.5%, betterXITK 25.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KNO 1.11, betterXITK 0.63
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KNO −33.6%, betterXITK −61.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KNO 1.09XITK 1.67

Popular comparisons

  • KNOCvsXTA

    AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XITKAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNOCvsKOMPA

    AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XITKAvsKOMPA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNOCvsTRFMA

    AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XITKAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.