XITK ranks 4th and KNO 19th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
KNO vs XITK
XITK −0.30pt a year
0.75%0.45%
XITK 3.4×the volume
6282.15K
XITK +2.8pt
+10.1%+12.9%
KNO vs XITK Performance
+39.7%−17.4%
- KNO 0.75%
- XITK 0.45%, better
- KNO $43M
- XITK $67M
- KNO +26.1%, better
- XITK +0.6%
- KNO 0.88%, better
- XITK 0.00%
- KNO 86
- XITK 95
- KNO 628 sh
- XITK 2.15K sh, better
- KNO $63.57
- XITK $197.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KNO | XITK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A95Higher |
| Mission | B55 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | F8 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A73Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. KNO and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KNOC
XITKA
In short
KNO Most innovation ETFs buy US tech stories. KNO rebuilds the books instead, treating R&D, brand and training spend as investment, then buying the developed-market companies that rank highest on that knowledge capital.
XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.
Stated mandate
KNO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equities of highly innovative knowledge-leader companies. It uses a proprietary quantitative screen emphasizing intangible-adjusted innovation intensity, financial strength, profitability, research and development, earnings growth, and operating cash flow.
XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KNO vs XITK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KNO vs XITK Cost
Overpaying KNO vs XITK
$5,441
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KNO 0.75%
$14,482
XITK 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KNO | XITK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $812 | $524 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,128 | $1,950 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,041 | $5,441 |
- 0.75%KNO
- 0.45%XITK, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
KNO 20th cheapest of 30 funds
KNO vs XITK Dividends
- KNO 0.88%, better
- XITK 0.00%
- KNO $0.55
- XITK None
- KNO $0.55
- XITK
- KNO Dec 23, 2025
- XITK
- KNO Dec 26, 2025
- XITK
- KNO Annual
- XITK
Distribution history
KNO vs XITK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KNO
- XITK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KNO 14.5%, betterXITK 25.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- KNO 1.11, betterXITK 0.63
- Worst fall
- KNO −33.6%, betterXITK −61.4%
- Market sensitivity
- KNO 1.09XITK 1.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.