Skip to content

KNO vs XT

AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF

KNOCNYSE Arca

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

XTANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

XT −0.29pt a year

KNO0.75%XT0.46%

Avg volume · 30D

XT 110.0×the volume

KNO628XT69.1K

10Y return · a year

XT +4.4pt

KNO+10.1%XT+14.5%

KNO vs XT Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+39.7%KNO+42.3%XT

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. KNO +39.7%. XT +42.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KNO 0.75%
XT 0.46%, better
Fund size
KNO $43M
XT $3.98B
1Y total return
KNO +26.1%, better
XT +20.1%
Yield (12M)
KNO 0.88%
XT 6.82%, better
Holdings
KNO 86
XT 216
Avg volume (30D)
KNO 628 sh
XT 69.1K sh, better
NAV per share
KNO $63.57
XT $83.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KNO: Cost 22, Risk 92, Mission 55, Tradability 8, Holdings 65, Durability 55. XT: Cost 95, Risk 91, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 66, Durability 96.
Pillar letters and Scores for KNO, XT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKNOXT
Cost30% weightF22A95Higher
Mission25% weightB55Not scored
Risk15% weightA92HigherA91
Tradability15% weightF8A77Higher
Holdings10% weightB65B66Higher
Durability5% weightB55A96Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KNO and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XT ranks 1st and KNO 19th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 19CARKKARK Innovation ETFScore 41
  4. Rank 19CKNOAXS Knowledge Leaders ETFScore 41
  5. Rank 21CSOCLGlobal X Social Media ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KNOCAXS Knowledge Leaders ETF

XTAiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

In short

KNO Most innovation ETFs buy US tech stories. KNO rebuilds the books instead, treating R&D, brand and training spend as investment, then buying the developed-market companies that rank highest on that knowledge capital.

XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.

Stated mandate

KNO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equities of highly innovative knowledge-leader companies. It uses a proprietary quantitative screen emphasizing intangible-adjusted innovation intensity, financial strength, profitability, research and development, earnings growth, and operating cash flow.

XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.

Why people hold it

  • KNO The mechanism is the point: spending on R&D, advertising, brand and employee training is treated as capital, not expense, surfacing innovators the usual tech screens miss.axsinvestments.com
  • All-sector and global by design, spanning North America, Europe and Asia, which is unusual in a category that leans heavily on US technology names.axsinvestments.com
  • Innovation is not the only test. The screen also weighs profitability, financial strength, earnings growth and operating cash flow.
  • Live since 2015 under its original Knowledge Leaders name before AXS took it over in 2024, so this is a long-running approach, not a freshly minted theme.prnewswire.com
  • XT Cheap for the theme at 0.46% a year, below the typical fee in its disruptive-innovation cohort and under peers like TRFM and FDTX.
  • Human fingerprint on the stock list: Morningstar equity analysts score companies on theme exposure instead of sorting by keywords or revenue tags.sec.govcontentstack.io
  • Global by construction (developed and emerging markets) and not fenced into the tech sector, so a drugmaker or an industrial can qualify on theme exposure.sec.gov
  • Launched in 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar iShares fund, it stands among the stronger builds in its innovation peer group.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • KNO The 0.75% fee sits above the category median across the 31 innovation funds we track, and above peers like KOMP at 0.20% and XT at 0.46%.
  • Among the smaller and more lightly traded funds in its group, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads and more price impact on bigger orders.
  • Actively managed on a proprietary screen and measured against a broad equal-weighted world index, so the portfolio can look nothing like a US tech fund.sec.gov
  • XT The index has been reworked since launch (weighting scheme, theme list), and themes get an annual review, so today's tilt is not fixed forever.morningstar.comsec.gov
  • Moderately traded rather than a household name, which can mean wider spreads than the biggest tech ETFs.
  • About 200 positions dilutes any single breakout winner, and distributions land only once or twice a year.

Full KNO profile⁠

Full XT profile⁠

KNO vs XT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KNO vs XT Cost

Overpaying KNO vs XT

$5,252

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KNO 0.75%

    $14,482

  • XT 0.46%

    $9,230

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KNO 0.75%
  • XT 0.46%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530KNO $14,482XT $9,230

Year by year

YearKNOXTOverpaying
10$1,336$830$506
20$5,078$3,195$1,883
30$14,482$9,230$5,252

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%KNO
  • 0.46%XT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds

KNO 20th cheapest of 30 funds

KNO vs XT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KNO 0.88%
XT 6.82%, better
Payout (12M)
KNO $0.55
XT $5.69
Last payment
KNO $0.55
XT $0.36
Ex-dividend
KNO Dec 23, 2025
XT Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
KNO Dec 26, 2025
XT Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
KNO Annual
XT Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KNOAnnual · 9 paymentsAll KNO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.23; Dec 24, 2018 $0.29; Dec 23, 2019 $0.36; Dec 23, 2020 $0.26; Dec 22, 2021 $0.23; Dec 21, 2022 $0.66; Dec 20, 2023 $0.56; Dec 23, 2024 $0.68; Dec 23, 2025 $0.55. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD
XTTwice a year · 23 paymentsAll XT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.24; Dec 21, 2017 $0.10; Dec 28, 2017 $0.0072; Jun 19, 2018 $0.29; Dec 18, 2018 $0.18; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.30; Jun 15, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.19; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Jun 10, 2021 $0.27; Dec 13, 2021 $0.28; Jun 9, 2022 $0.22; Dec 13, 2022 $0.15; Jun 7, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.16; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Dec 30, 2024 $0.0094; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $5.33; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$52017202020232026YTD

KNO vs XT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KNO
  • XT
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XT −34.4% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KNO 14.5%, betterXT 16.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KNO 1.11, betterXT 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KNO −33.6%, betterXT −34.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KNO 1.09XT 1.35

KNO and XT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • KNOCvsKOMPA

    AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsKOMPA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNOCvsTRFMA

    AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsTRFMA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KNOCvsXITKA

    AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAvsXITKA

    iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.