MOOD vs RISN: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

MOODBNasdaq

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

RISN −0.05pt a year

MOOD0.77%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

MOOD 1.4×the volume

MOOD20.8KRISN14.8K

3Y return · a year

MOOD +9.7pt

MOOD+23.0%RISN+13.3%

MOOD vs RISN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.0%MOOD+4.8%RISN

Expense ratio: MOOD 0.77%; RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size: MOOD $161M; RISN $70M
1Y total return: MOOD +20.0%, better; RISN +4.8%
Yield (12M): MOOD 0.35%; RISN 1.05%, better
Holdings: MOOD 12; RISN 53
Avg volume (30D): MOOD 20.8K sh, better; RISN 14.8K sh
NAV per share: MOOD $44.23; RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for MOOD, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	MOOD	RISN
Cost30% weight	A71	A76Higher
Mission25% weight	C40	A85Higher
Risk15% weight	B61Higher	C46
Tradability15% weight	A78Higher	B64
Holdings10% weight	C50	A80Higher
Durability5% weight	B61	B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. MOOD and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds

See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and MOOD 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
Rank 12BLGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETFScore 60
Rank 12BMOODRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETFScore 60
Rank 14BHIDEAlpha Architect High Inflation And Deflation ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MOODBRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

MOOD Most tactical funds follow price. MOOD follows the gap between institutional and retail sentiment, averaging four indicators into one equity dial that can swing from 0% to fully invested.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

MOOD The Fund seeks capital appreciation by tactically allocating among ETFs and exchange-traded products covering equities, fixed income, commodities, including gold, and currencies.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

MOOD The engine is written down: four relative sentiment indicators, each scaled 0% to 100%, averaged into the equity allocation. Long only, no leverage.alphaarchitect.com etfarchitect.com
Fee of 0.77% sits below the median for tactical allocation funds, with no waiver propping it up, and the fund stands in the upper half of that peer group.
Live since 2022 and measured against a stated blend: 40% US aggregate bonds, 30% US large caps, 30% developed markets outside North America.
Gold and commodities enter on documented triggers, such as bearish dollar and Fed-policy sentiment, rather than a manager's hunch.alphaarchitect.com

RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

MOOD The sentiment inputs are proprietary: you see the resulting weights, not the signal. Allocations are recomputed weekly and reallocated at the adviser's discretion.etfarchitect.com alphaarchitect.com
0.77% is below the category median, but cheaper tactical peers exist: ENDW at 0.22%, PBL at 0.45%, GMOD at 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
Non-diversified by design and thinly traded, so a small book of ETFs drives results and spreads can run wider than the category's household names.sec.gov

RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full MOOD profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

MOOD vs RISN Holdings

How MOOD and RISN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MOOD and 0.0% of RISN.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Sector11 Sectors46.4%
Countryby domicile97.0%

Sector

Sector weights in MOOD and RISN, widest gap first
Sector	More in MOODMore in RISN	MOOD	RISN
Technology	MOOD +29.6 points	39.6%	10.0%
Industrials	RISN +19.7 points	7.5%	27.2%
Financials	RISN +15.1 points	12.6%	27.7%
Energy	RISN +12.2 points	3.1%	15.4%
Communication	MOOD +9.1 points	9.1%	0.0%
Health Care	MOOD +7.2 points	8.8%	1.6%
Materials	RISN +6.5 points	1.6%	8.1%
Consumer Discretionary	MOOD +5.4 points	10.3%	4.9%
Consumer Staples	MOOD +2.4 points	4.1%	1.7%
Utilities	MOOD +0.1 points	1.8%	1.7%
Real Estate	Same weight	1.7%	1.7%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MOOD and RISN, widest gap first
Country	More in MOODMore in RISN	MOOD	RISN
United States	RISN +3.0 points	97.0%	100.0%
Taiwan	MOOD +0.5 points	0.5%	0.0%
Other countries (29)	MOOD +2.5 points	2.5%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

MOOD99.1%
RISN35.2%

Securities held

MOOD12
RISN52

Asset class

MOOD: Multi-Asset
RISN: Equity

Holdings

Only in MOOD12
In both0
Only in RISN52

Only in MOOD

12 securities, 100% of MOOD by weight

Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF29.62%
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF24.95%
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund20.13%
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF4.99%
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF4.70%
State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF3.65%
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF3.63%
Invesco QQQ Trust Series 13.44%
VanEck Semiconductor ETF3.40%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.63%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF0.60%
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF0.60%

Only in RISN

52 securities, 100% of RISN by weight

Wisdomtree Float19.09%
United Parcel-B1.82%
Home Depot Inc1.82%
Nasdaq Inc1.81%
Cheniere Energy1.81%
Eog Resources1.79%
Exxonmobil Holdi1.77%
Cintas Corp1.77%
Republic Svcs1.76%
Waste Management1.75%
Csx Corp1.74%
Nucor Corp1.74%
Automatic Data1.73%
Targa Resources1.73%
Occidental Pete1.72%
Progressive Corp1.72%
Norfolk Southern1.72%
Aflac Inc1.72%
Crh PLC1.71%
3M Co1.71%
Slb Ltd1.71%
Kinder Morgan In1.71%
Fedex Corp1.70%
United Rentals1.70%
Simon Property1.69%
Nextera Energy1.69%
Carvana Co1.68%
Intercont Exch I1.68%
Mondelez Inter-A1.67%
O'reilly Automot1.63%
Fastenal Co1.63%
Linde PLC1.62%
Iqvia Holdings I1.59%
Ametek Inc1.55%
Baker Hughes Co1.52%
Delta Air Li1.51%
Southern Copper1.50%
Valero Energy1.48%
Western Digital1.48%
Paccar Inc1.47%
Freeport-Mcmoran1.47%
Broadcom Inc1.46%
Amphenol Corp-A1.45%
Applovin Co-Cl A1.44%
Parker Hannifin1.43%
Interactive Brok1.43%
Ge Vernova Inc1.37%
Kla Corp1.31%
Sandisk Corp1.20%
Comfort Systems1.19%

Weight gaps

MOOD and RISN share no securities.

All 5 MOOD holdings⁠All RISN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MOOD vs RISN Cost

Overpaying MOOD vs RISN

$872

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

MOOD 0.77%
$14,829
RISN 0.72%
$13,957

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

MOOD 0.77%
RISN 0.72%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	MOOD	RISN	Overpaying
10	$1,371	$1,284	$87
20	$5,205	$4,888	$317
30	$14,829	$13,957	$872

Expense ratio

0.77%MOOD
0.72%RISN, cheaper

RISN0.72%MOOD0.77%

0.22%1.99%

Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

MOOD 14th cheapest of 46 funds

MOOD vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): MOOD 0.35%; RISN 1.05%, better
Payout (12M): MOOD $0.15; RISN $0.32
Last payment: MOOD $0.15; RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend: MOOD Dec 30, 2025; RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on: MOOD Dec 31, 2025; RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency: MOOD Annual; RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

MOODAnnual · 4 paymentsAll MOOD payments⁠

RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠

MOOD vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: MOOD 9.5%, betterRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: MOOD 1.78, betterRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: MOOD −14.3%since May 2022RISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: MOOD 0.95RISN 1.08; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

MOODBvsENDWA
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF
Expense ratio
0.77% · 0.22%
Category
RISNAvsENDWA
Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF
Expense ratio
0.72% · 0.22%
Category
MOODBvsGMODA
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
Expense ratio
0.77% · 0.50%
Category
RISNAvsGMODA
Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF
Expense ratio
0.72% · 0.50%
Category
MOODBvsPTBDA
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
Expense ratio
0.77% · 0.60%
Category
RISNAvsPTBDA
Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
Expense ratio
0.72% · 0.60%
Category