SETM ranks 4th and NIKL 12th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
NIKL vs SETM
SETM −0.10pt a year
0.75%0.65%
SETM 2.9×the volume
54.6K157K
SETM +25.4pt
−8.3%+17.1%
NIKL vs SETM Performance
−24.7%−8.3%
- NIKL 0.75%
- SETM 0.65%, better
- NIKL $39M
- SETM $418M
- NIKL −24.7%
- SETM −8.3%, better
- NIKL 3.80%, better
- SETM 1.85%
- NIKL 27
- SETM 157
- NIKL 54.6K sh
- SETM 157K sh, better
- NIKL $10.63
- SETM $24.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NIKL | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | D38Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | D25 | A80Higher |
| Durability | C42 | B64Higher |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. NIKL and SETM are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NIKLF
SETMC
In short
NIKL Nickel is the metal stainless steel and battery cathodes run on, and NIKL is the only US ETF built purely on the companies digging it. One metal, roughly two dozen global miners, no diversified-mining cushion.
SETM Most funds in this corner pick a lane: lithium, or rare earths. SETM tracks an index built to span the wider critical-materials complex, roughly 160 miners and processors in a single basket.
Stated mandate
NIKL NIKL is designed to deliver returns broadly corresponding to the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index before fees and expenses.
SETM SETM seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NIKL vs SETM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NIKL vs SETM Cost
Overpaying NIKL vs SETM
$1,765
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NIKL 0.75%
$14,482
SETM 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NIKL | SETM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,163 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $4,440 | $638 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $12,717 | $1,765 |
- 0.75%NIKL
- 0.65%SETM, cheaper
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
SETM 7th cheapest of 12 funds
NIKL 11th cheapest of 12 funds
NIKL vs SETM Dividends
- NIKL 3.80%, better
- SETM 1.85%
- NIKL $0.40
- SETM $0.45
- NIKL $0.40
- SETM $0.45
- NIKL Dec 18, 2025
- SETM Dec 18, 2025
- NIKL Dec 22, 2025
- SETM Dec 22, 2025
- NIKL Annual
- SETM Annual
Distribution history
NIKL vs SETM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NIKL 36.8%SETM 36.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NIKL −0.17SETM 0.49, better
- Worst fall
- NIKL −60.4%SETM −42.8%
- Market sensitivity
- NIKL 1.10SETM 1.33
NIKL and SETM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

