PSFO ranks 4th and NVBW 15th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
NVBW vs PSFO
PSFO −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
PSFO 1.3×the volume
5.35K7.12K
PSFO +3.4pt
+11.1%+14.5%
NVBW vs PSFO Performance
+10.0%+11.5%
- NVBW 0.74%
- PSFO 0.49%, better
- NVBW $97M
- PSFO $47M
- NVBW +10.0%
- PSFO +11.5%, better
- NVBW 2
- PSFO 4
- NVBW 5.35K sh
- PSFO 7.12K sh, better
- NVBW $37.06
- PSFO $35.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NVBW | PSFO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C47Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | B58 | |
| Durability | B57 | B59Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. NVBW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NVBWC
PSFOB
In short
NVBW An insurance hedging desk in ETF form: NVBW absorbs the first 20% of a year's losses in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap reset each November.
PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.
Stated mandate
NVBW The Fund seeks to track the share-price returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over its one-year Outcome Period up to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses in the Underlying ETF.
PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NVBW vs PSFO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NVBW vs PSFO Cost
Overpaying NVBW vs PSFO
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NVBW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NVBW | PSFO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%NVBW
- 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFO cheapest of 24 funds
NVBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
NVBW vs PSFO Dividends
- NVBW None
- PSFO None
Distribution history
NVBW vs PSFO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NVBW 4.6%, betterPSFO 6.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- NVBW 1.35PSFO 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- NVBW −8.4%PSFO −12.1%
- Market sensitivity
- NVBW 0.40PSFO 0.50
NVBW and PSFO in the news
Filings Digest
TACK holders vote Dec. 10 on the move to Amplify

Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.