Skip to content

NVBW vs PSFO

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF

NVBWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.25pt a year

NVBW0.74%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFO 1.3×the volume

NVBW5.35KPSFO7.12K

3Y return · a year

PSFO +3.4pt

NVBW+11.1%PSFO+14.5%

NVBW vs PSFO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.0%NVBW+11.5%PSFO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. NVBW +10.0%. PSFO +11.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%7.5%Oct 2025May 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NVBW 0.74%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
NVBW $97M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
NVBW +10.0%
PSFO +11.5%, better
Holdings
NVBW 2
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
NVBW 5.35K sh
PSFO 7.12K sh, better
NAV per share
NVBW $37.06
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NVBW: Cost 37, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 58, Durability 57. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for NVBW, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNVBWPSFO
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC47HigherD29
Tradability15% weightB59HigherC44
Holdings10% weightB58Not scored
Durability5% weightB57B59Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NVBW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 4th and NVBW 15th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 15CMAYWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 May ETFScore 47
  7. Rank 15CNVBWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETFScore 47
  8. Rank 17CAUGWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Aug ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NVBWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

NVBW An insurance hedging desk in ETF form: NVBW absorbs the first 20% of a year's losses in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap reset each November.

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

NVBW The Fund seeks to track the share-price returns of the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust over its one-year Outcome Period up to an upside cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses in the Underlying ETF.

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

  • NVBW The 20% buffer is at the deep end of the buffer shelf, and it resets on a fresh one-year clock every November.allianzim.com
  • AllianzIM runs the options itself, on the same in-house hedging platform Allianz Life uses for its annuity book, instead of outsourcing the trade.allianzlife.com
  • At 0.74%, the fee sits right at the middle of its deep-buffer peer group. No premium for the Allianz name.
  • Live since 2022, with multiple full outcome periods completed.
  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

  • NVBW Buffer and cap apply in full only if you hold from the start of the November outcome period to its end. Buy mid-period and your terms differ.allianzlife.com
  • Cheaper deep-buffer alternatives exist: PSFJ and PSFM both charge 0.49%.
  • You track SPY's share-price returns, so dividends aren't part of the deal, and the fund trades lightly enough that limit orders matter.
  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full NVBW profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

NVBW vs PSFO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NVBW vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying NVBW vs PSFO

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NVBW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NVBW 0.74%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530NVBW $14,307PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearNVBWPSFOOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%NVBW
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

NVBW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

NVBW vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NVBW None
PSFO None

Distribution history

NVBWAll NVBW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NVBW vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NVBW 4.6%, betterPSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NVBW 1.35PSFO 1.38, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NVBW −8.4%since Nov 2022PSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NVBW 0.40PSFO 0.50

NVBW and PSFO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • NVBWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NVBWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.