Skip to content

PSFO vs SEPW

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF

SEPWCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.25pt a year

PSFO0.49%SEPW0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SEPW 6.6×the volume

PSFO7.12KSEPW47K

3Y return · a year

PSFO +2.7pt

PSFO+14.5%SEPW+11.8%

PSFO vs SEPW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.5%PSFO+7.2%SEPW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PSFO +11.5%. SEPW +7.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSFO 0.49%, better
SEPW 0.74%
Fund size
PSFO $47M
SEPW $213M
1Y total return
PSFO +11.5%, better
SEPW +7.2%
Holdings
PSFO 4
SEPW 3
Avg volume (30D)
PSFO 7.12K sh
SEPW 47K sh, better
NAV per share
PSFO $35.95
SEPW $34.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 44, Holdings not scored, Durability 59. SEPW: Cost 37, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 83, Holdings 69, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSFO, SEPW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSFOSEPW
Cost30% weightA85HigherD37
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightD29C41Higher
Tradability15% weightC44A83Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB69
Durability5% weightB59HigherB55

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSFO and SEPW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 4th and SEPW 10th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 10CAPRWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52
  8. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

SEPWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF

In short

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

SEPW September's door into AllianzIM's deep-buffer series: SEPW absorbs the first 20% of a year's decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's share price, and trades away upside above a cap that resets every September 1.

Stated mandate

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

SEPW The fund seeks to track the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust through the current outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while protecting the first 20% of underlying losses. Fees reduce the stated cap and buffer.

Why people hold it

  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.
  • SEPW Deep end of the buffer world: the first 20% of the reference ETF's price decline over a full outcome period is absorbed. Fees reduce the stated buffer and cap.
  • A 1940 Act ETF, not a bank-issued note, so no single issuer's balance sheet sits between the strategy and the payoff.
  • One month in a series: March and May siblings run the same 20% buffer on the same reference, so the start date isn't dictated by a single point on the calendar.

Worth knowing

  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.
  • SEPW Cost sits at the top of the deep-buffer group: 0.74%, against 0.50% at PGIM's laddered PBFR and 0.49% at the Pacer Swan flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM).
  • The reference is a share price, so S&P 500 dividends don't count toward the capped return, and income isn't part of the design.
  • Bought mid-period, the effective buffer and cap differ from the headline terms, which apply across a complete outcome period.

Full PSFO profile⁠

Full SEPW profile⁠

PSFO vs SEPW Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSFO vs SEPW Cost

Overpaying SEPW vs PSFO

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

  • SEPW 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSFO 0.49%
  • SEPW 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SEPW $14,307PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearPSFOSEPWOverpaying
10$883$1,319$436
20$3,394$5,015$1,621
30$9,792$14,307$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • 0.74%SEPW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

SEPW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

PSFO vs SEPW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PSFO None
SEPW None

Distribution history

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SEPWAll SEPW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFO vs SEPW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSFO 6.8%SEPW 4.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSFO 1.38SEPW 1.41, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSFO −12.1%SEPW −8.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSFO 0.50SEPW 0.39

Popular comparisons

  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.