QLD ranks 1st and UBOT 89th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs UBOT
QLD −0.43pt a year
0.89%1.32%
QLD 279.8×the volume
4.15M14.8K
QLD +31.9pt
+13.6%−18.3%
QLD vs UBOT Performance
+89.5%−63.7%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- UBOT 1.32%
- QLD $13.3B
- UBOT $19M
- QLD +7.6%, better
- UBOT −35.6%
- QLD 0.15%
- UBOT 1.41%, better
- QLD 113
- UBOT 8
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- UBOT 14.8K sh
- QLD $82.56
- UBOT $17.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | UBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B58 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and UBOT are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
UBOTD
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
UBOT A geared bet on the robot-and-AI build-out: UBOT aims for 200% of the daily move of a global robotics and artificial intelligence index. Direxion dialed it down from 3x to 2x in 2020, so it is the same theme at a tamer daily multiple.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
UBOT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs UBOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs UBOT Cost
Overpaying UBOT vs QLD
$6,796
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
UBOT 1.32%
$23,668
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | UBOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $2,296 | $720 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $8,507 | $2,554 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $23,668 | $6,796 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 1.32%UBOT
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
UBOT 91st cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs UBOT Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- UBOT 1.41%, better
- QLD $0.12
- UBOT $0.25
- QLD $0.03
- UBOT $0.07
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- UBOT Sep 22, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- UBOT Sep 29, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- UBOT Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs UBOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLD
- UBOT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%, betterUBOT 46.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04, betterUBOT 0.36
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%, betterUBOT −82.9%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46UBOT 3.02
QLD and UBOT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
