DDM ranks 4th and UBOT 89th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
DDM vs UBOT
DDM −0.37pt a year
0.95%1.32%
DDM 12.5×the volume
185K14.8K
DDM +29.3pt
+11.0%−18.3%
DDM vs UBOT Performance
+68.3%−63.7%
- DDM 0.95%, better
- UBOT 1.32%
- DDM $507M
- UBOT $19M
- DDM +14.5%, better
- UBOT −35.6%
- DDM 0.97%
- UBOT 1.41%, better
- DDM 34
- UBOT 8
- DDM 185K sh, better
- UBOT 14.8K sh
- DDM $62.99
- UBOT $17.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DDM | UBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51Higher | F8 |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | A79Higher | B58 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DDM and UBOT are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DDMB
UBOTD
In short
DDM The Dow dates to 1896. DDM is the only ETF built to double its daily move: 2x the Dow Jones Industrial Average, reset every single day, for 0.95% a year, running since 2006.
UBOT A geared bet on the robot-and-AI build-out: UBOT aims for 200% of the daily move of a global robotics and artificial intelligence index. Direxion dialed it down from 3x to 2x in 2020, so it is the same theme at a tamer daily multiple.
Stated mandate
DDM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
UBOT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DDM vs UBOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DDM vs UBOT Cost
Overpaying UBOT vs DDM
$5,799
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DDM 0.95%
$17,869
UBOT 1.32%
$23,668
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DDM | UBOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $2,296 | $618 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $8,507 | $2,185 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $23,668 | $5,799 |
- 0.95%DDM, cheaper
- 1.32%UBOT
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DDM 32nd cheapest of 95 funds
UBOT 91st cheapest of 95 funds
DDM vs UBOT Dividends
- DDM 0.97%
- UBOT 1.41%, better
- DDM $0.62
- UBOT $0.25
- DDM $0.15
- UBOT $0.07
- DDM Sep 23, 2026
- UBOT Sep 22, 2026
- DDM Sep 29, 2026
- UBOT Sep 29, 2026
- DDM Quarterly
- UBOT Quarterly
Distribution history
DDM vs UBOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DDM
- UBOT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DDM 24.6%, betterUBOT 46.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- DDM 0.96, betterUBOT 0.36
- Worst fall
- DDM −40.2%, betterUBOT −82.9%
- Market sensitivity
- DDM 1.73UBOT 3.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.