ROM ranks 3rd and UBOT 89th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
ROM vs UBOT
ROM −0.39pt a year
0.93%1.32%
ROM 3.2×the volume
47.7K14.8K
ROM +34.3pt
+16.0%−18.3%
ROM vs UBOT Performance
+110.3%−63.7%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- UBOT 1.32%
- ROM $1.15B
- UBOT $19M
- ROM +19.3%, better
- UBOT −35.6%
- ROM 0.03%
- UBOT 1.41%, better
- ROM 85
- UBOT 8
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- UBOT 14.8K sh
- ROM $132.18
- UBOT $17.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROM | UBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | F8 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | B58 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. ROM and UBOT are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROMA
UBOTD
In short
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
UBOT A geared bet on the robot-and-AI build-out: UBOT aims for 200% of the daily move of a global robotics and artificial intelligence index. Direxion dialed it down from 3x to 2x in 2020, so it is the same theme at a tamer daily multiple.
Stated mandate
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
UBOT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROM vs UBOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROM vs UBOT Cost
Overpaying UBOT vs ROM
$6,129
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
UBOT 1.32%
$23,668
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROM | UBOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $2,296 | $652 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $8,507 | $2,308 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $23,668 | $6,129 |
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- 1.32%UBOT
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
UBOT 91st cheapest of 95 funds
ROM vs UBOT Dividends
- ROM 0.03%
- UBOT 1.41%, better
- ROM $0.04
- UBOT $0.25
- ROM $0.02
- UBOT $0.07
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- UBOT Sep 22, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- UBOT Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Quarterly
- UBOT Quarterly
Distribution history
ROM vs UBOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROM
- UBOT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROM 49.3%UBOT 46.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ROM 0.97, betterUBOT 0.36
- Worst fall
- ROM −67.6%, betterUBOT −82.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ROM 3.09UBOT 3.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.32% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.