Skip to content
etf.net

RCTR vs URA

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

RCTRBNYSE Arca

Global X Uranium ETF

URABNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

URA −0.01pt a year

RCTR0.70%URA0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

URA 767.0×the volume

RCTR4.45KURA3.41M

RCTR vs URA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−15.3%RCTR−35.8%URA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. RCTR −15.3%. URA −35.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RCTR 0.70%
URA 0.69%, better
Fund size
RCTR $29M
URA $4.73B
1Y total return
RCTR −15.3%, better
URA −35.8%
Yield (12M)
RCTR No data
URA 6.18%
Holdings
RCTR 49
URA 61
Avg volume (30D)
RCTR 4.45K sh
URA 3.41M sh, better
NAV per share
RCTR $30.28
URA $33.94
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RCTR: Cost 62, Risk 70, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 71, Durability 51. URA: Cost 62, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 50, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for RCTR, URA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRCTRURA
Cost30% weightB62B62
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA70HigherD39
Tradability15% weightC45B67Higher
Holdings10% weightA71HigherC50
Durability5% weightC51A89Higher

Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RCTR and URA are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Uranium & Nuclear⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

RCTR ranks 3rd and URA 4th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.

  1. Rank 1ANLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2BSMRFALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BRCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4BURAGlobal X Uranium ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 5CNUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RCTRBFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

URABGlobal X Uranium ETF

In short

RCTR No data

URA The original US uranium ETF, trading since 2010, long before the nuclear theme got crowded. It holds roughly 50 names spanning miners and nuclear-component makers, so the reactor supply chain rides along with the yellowcake.

Stated mandate

RCTR No data

URA The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. It concentrates at least 80% of assets in companies involved in uranium or nuclear-component activities.

Why people hold it

RCTR No data

  • URA Launched in 2010, the first US fund on this theme, and today a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded name. Size and volume usually mean tighter spreads for the person clicking buy.
  • 0.69% expense ratio sits below the typical fee among uranium and nuclear funds, which is rare for a single-theme product this specialized.
  • Not a pure miner basket. The index reaches into nuclear components too, with at least 80% of assets in uranium or nuclear-component companies, worldwide.
  • Rates as one of the stronger builds in its uranium and nuclear peer group on cost, tradability and staying power.

Worth knowing

RCTR No data

  • URA One theme, about 50 stocks. Uranium prices, mine permits and reactor policy move the whole basket at once, and the ride has historically been bumpy.
  • A cheaper shelf-mate exists: NLR charges 0.52% for a nearby uranium and nuclear mandate.
  • Global mandate means overseas miners, so foreign currency and permitting regimes come with the package. Distributions arrive once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full RCTR profile⁠

Full URA profile⁠

RCTR vs URA Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RCTR vs URA Cost

Overpaying RCTR vs URA

$177

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RCTR 0.70%

    $13,606

  • URA 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RCTR 0.70%
  • URA 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530RCTR $13,606URA $13,429

Year by year

YearRCTRURAOverpaying
10$1,250$1,232$18
20$4,760$4,697$63
30$13,606$13,429$177

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%RCTR
  • 0.69%URA, cheaper
  • Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
  • Median 0.75%

URA 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

RCTR 4th cheapest of 9 funds

RCTR vs URA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RCTR No data
URA 6.18%
Payout (12M)
RCTR No data
URA $2.08
Last payment
RCTR $0.06
URA $2.08
Ex-dividend
RCTR Sep 24, 2026
URA Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
RCTR Sep 30, 2026
URA Jan 7, 2026
Frequency
RCTR Quarterly
URA Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RCTRQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll RCTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 12, 2025 $0.12; Mar 26, 2026 $0.03; Jun 25, 2026 $0.07; Sep 24, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
URAAnnual · 14 paymentsAll URA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.31; Dec 28, 2018 $0.05; Jun 27, 2019 $0.10; Dec 30, 2019 $0.08; Jun 29, 2020 $0.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.10; Jun 29, 2021 $0.02; Dec 30, 2021 $1.31; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.05; Dec 28, 2023 $1.68; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Dec 30, 2024 $0.74; Dec 30, 2025 $2.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

RCTR vs URA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RCTR 24.8%since Aug 2025URA 43.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RCTR −0.02since Aug 2025URA 0.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RCTR −22.3%since Jul 2025URA −45.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RCTR 1.11URA 1.41

RCTR and URA in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • RCTRBvsNLRA

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • URABvsNLRA

    Global X Uranium ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RCTRBvsSMRFB

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • URABvsSMRFB

    Global X Uranium ETF · ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RCTRBvsNUKZC

    First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • URABvsNUKZC

    Global X Uranium ETF · Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.