Skip to content

SMRF vs URA

ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

SMRFBNYSE Arca

Global X Uranium ETF

URABNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SMRF −0.04pt a year

SMRF0.65%URA0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

URA 386.9×the volume

SMRF8.82KURA3.41M

SMRF vs URA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−15.1%SMRF−13.7%URA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. SMRF −15.1%. URA −13.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SMRF 0.65%, better
URA 0.69%
Fund size
SMRF $14M
URA $4.73B
1Y total return
SMRF No data
URA −35.8%
Yield (12M)
SMRF No data
URA 6.18%
Holdings
SMRF 78
URA 61
Avg volume (30D)
SMRF 8.82K sh
URA 3.41M sh, better
NAV per share
SMRF $19.43
URA $33.94
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SMRF: Cost 78, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 81, Durability 44. URA: Cost 62, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 50, Durability 89.
Pillar letters and Scores for SMRF, URA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSMRFURA
Cost30% weightA78HigherB62
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC50HigherD39
Tradability15% weightB59B67Higher
Holdings10% weightA81HigherC50
Durability5% weightC44A89Higher

Rank among Uranium & Nuclear funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SMRF and URA are both graded against the same 9 Uranium & Nuclear funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Uranium & Nuclear⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

SMRF ranks 2nd and URA 4th of 9 funds in the Uranium & Nuclear Category.

  1. Rank 1ANLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2BSMRFALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BRCTRFirst Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4BURAGlobal X Uranium ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 5CNUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SMRFBALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF

URABGlobal X Uranium ETF

In short

SMRF Nuclear power meets option-writing. SMRF actively holds about 70 global small-modular-reactor, nuclear and related tech names, then buys and writes options on top to pull income from a famously jumpy theme.

URA The original US uranium ETF, trading since 2010, long before the nuclear theme got crowded. It holds roughly 50 names spanning miners and nuclear-component makers, so the reactor supply chain rides along with the yellowcake.

Stated mandate

SMRF The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income through an actively managed portfolio of equity securities significantly tied to the Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology Index, together with bought and written options.

URA The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. It concentrates at least 80% of assets in companies involved in uranium or nuclear-component activities.

Why people hold it

  • SMRF Charges 0.65% a year, under the median for its options-income peer group and below names like HYGW (0.69%) and SVOL (0.66%).
  • One wrapper, two jobs: the fund seeks capital appreciation and income, pairing the stock sleeve with bought and written options.
  • Actively managed around the Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology Index rather than bolted to it, so the manager sets the option book.
  • Spreads across roughly 70 global holdings instead of a handful of pure-play reactor startups, and the income policy targets a relatively stable payout level.
  • URA Launched in 2010, the first US fund on this theme, and today a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded name. Size and volume usually mean tighter spreads for the person clicking buy.
  • 0.69% expense ratio sits below the typical fee among uranium and nuclear funds, which is rare for a single-theme product this specialized.
  • Not a pure miner basket. The index reaches into nuclear components too, with at least 80% of assets in uranium or nuclear-component companies, worldwide.
  • Rates as one of the stronger builds in its uranium and nuclear peer group on cost, tradability and staying power.

Worth knowing

  • SMRF Written calls trade away part of a big rally for premium today. In a runaway nuclear melt-up, the option book is the brake.
  • Launched in 2026 with a small asset base and thin trading, so spreads can run wider than in the giants of the category.
  • A single-theme portfolio tied to reactors, uranium and power-hungry tech moves on policy and project news, and swings harder than a broad index.
  • URA One theme, about 50 stocks. Uranium prices, mine permits and reactor policy move the whole basket at once, and the ride has historically been bumpy.
  • A cheaper shelf-mate exists: NLR charges 0.52% for a nearby uranium and nuclear mandate.
  • Global mandate means overseas miners, so foreign currency and permitting regimes come with the package. Distributions arrive once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full SMRF profile⁠

Full URA profile⁠

SMRF vs URA Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SMRF vs URA Cost

Overpaying URA vs SMRF

$712

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SMRF 0.65%

    $12,717

  • URA 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SMRF 0.65%
  • URA 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530URA $13,429SMRF $12,717

Year by year

YearSMRFURAOverpaying
10$1,163$1,232$69
20$4,440$4,697$257
30$12,717$13,429$712

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%SMRF, cheaper
  • 0.69%URA
  • Middle half of Uranium & Nuclear funds
  • Median 0.75%

SMRF 2nd cheapest of 9 funds

URA 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

SMRF vs URA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
SMRF No data
URA 6.18%
Payout (12M)
SMRF No data
URA $2.08
Last payment
SMRF $0.07
URA $2.08
Ex-dividend
SMRF Oct 22, 2026
URA Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
SMRF Oct 27, 2026
URA Jan 7, 2026
Frequency
SMRF Monthly
URA Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

SMRFMonthly · 6 paymentsAll SMRF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. May 21, 2026 $0.03; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Jul 16, 2026 $0.07; Aug 20, 2026 $0.07; Sep 17, 2026 $0.07; Oct 22, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD
URAAnnual · 4 paymentsAll URA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2023 $1.68; Jun 27, 2024 $0.02; Dec 30, 2024 $0.74; Dec 30, 2025 $2.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD

SMRF vs URA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SMRF No dataURA 43.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SMRF No dataURA 0.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SMRF No dataURA −45.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SMRF 1.98URA 1.41

SMRF and URA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SMRFBvsNLRA

    ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • URABvsNLRA

    Global X Uranium ETF · VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.52%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMRFBvsRCTRB

    ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF · First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • URABvsRCTRB

    Global X Uranium ETF · First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.70%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMRFBvsNUKZC

    ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF · Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • URABvsNUKZC

    Global X Uranium ETF · Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.