SETM ranks 4th and REXC 9th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
REXC vs SETM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.65%0.65%
REXC 1.02×the volume
160K157K
REXC vs SETM Performance
−15.5%−14.3%
- REXC 0.65%
- SETM 0.65%
- REXC $74M
- SETM $418M
- REXC
- SETM −8.3%
- REXC
- SETM 1.85%
- REXC 42
- SETM 157
- REXC 160K sh, better
- SETM 157K sh
- REXC $13.17
- SETM $24.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | REXC | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | D27 | A80Higher |
| Durability | C51 | B64Higher |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. REXC and SETM are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
REXCD
SETMC
In short
REXC Rare earths, with China screened out. REXC tracks a Nasdaq index built around rare earth miners and processors outside China, the focused cut of Sprott's critical-materials lineup.
SETM Most funds in this corner pick a lane: lithium, or rare earths. SETM tracks an index built to span the wider critical-materials complex, roughly 160 miners and processors in a single basket.
Stated mandate
REXC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index.
SETM SETM seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
REXC vs SETM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
REXC vs SETM Cost
Same expense ratio
$12,717
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
REXC 0.65%
$12,717
SETM 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | REXC | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,163 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,440 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $12,717 |
- 0.65%REXC
- 0.65%SETM
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
REXC 7th cheapest of 12 funds
SETM 7th cheapest of 12 funds
REXC vs SETM Dividends
- REXC
- SETM 1.85%
- REXC None
- SETM $0.45
- REXC
- SETM $0.45
- REXC
- SETM Dec 18, 2025
- REXC
- SETM Dec 22, 2025
- REXC
- SETM Annual
Distribution history
REXC vs SETM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- REXC SETM 36.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- REXC SETM 0.49
- Worst fall
- REXC SETM −42.8%
- Market sensitivity
- REXC 2.56SETM 1.33
REXC and SETM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



