Skip to content

RISN vs THMR

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF

THMRCNYSE

Overlap

1.8%by weight

Expense ratio

RISN −0.38pt a year

RISN0.72%THMR1.10%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 1.2×the volume

RISN14.8KTHMR12.9K

RISN vs THMR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.6%RISN+1.6%THMR

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. RISN +0.6%. THMR +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RISN 0.72%, better
THMR 1.10%
Fund size
RISN $70M
THMR $42M
1Y total return
RISN +4.8%
THMR No data
Yield (12M)
RISN 1.05%
THMR No data
Holdings
RISN 53
THMR 20
Avg volume (30D)
RISN 14.8K sh, better
THMR 12.9K sh
NAV per share
RISN $31.09
THMR $25.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68. THMR: Cost 22, Risk 28, Mission 70, Tradability 49, Holdings 68, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for RISN, THMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRISNTHMR
Cost30% weightA76HigherF22
Mission25% weightA85HigherA70
Risk15% weightC46HigherD28
Tradability15% weightB64HigherC49
Holdings10% weightA80HigherB68
Durability5% weightB68HigherD33

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RISN and THMR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and THMR 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 33CBITCBitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETFScore 44
  7. Rank 33CTHMRTHOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETFScore 44
  8. Rank 35CDYTASGI Dynamic Tactical ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

THMRCTHOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF

In short

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

THMR A machine-learning-assisted tactical allocator that roams across stocks, bonds, commodities and alternatives, and is allowed to reach for leveraged ETFs when it wants more punch. Fully active, unconstrained, and priced like it.

Stated mandate

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

THMR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed, risk-managed multi-strategy approach. It dynamically allocates among strategies investing in stocks, ETFs and leveraged ETFs across equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives, using machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization.

Why people hold it

  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.
  • THMR One ticker, many markets: the manager can shift among equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives instead of riding a fixed blend.
  • The toolkit includes leveraged ETFs, so exposure can be dialed up or down inside the fund rather than by you placing the trades.
  • Actively managed with machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization, so there is no index to hug when the tape turns.

Worth knowing

  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.
  • THMR Costs 1.10% a year, above the typical tactical multi-asset fund and well above top-ranked peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%).
  • A small asset base and light trading can mean wider spreads, which shows up most on large or hurried orders.
  • A 2026 launch built for capital appreciation, not income, and leveraged ETF positions amplify moves in both directions.

Full RISN profile⁠

Full THMR profile⁠

RISN vs THMR Holdings

How RISN and THMR differ

Overlap by weight

1.8%

Shared holdings make up 3.5% of THMR and 1.8% of RISN.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both1.8%
  • Countryby domicile97.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for THMR.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in RISN and THMR, widest gap first
CountryMore in RISNMore in THMR
United StatesRISN +2.3 points
TaiwanTHMR +1.0 points
NetherlandsTHMR +0.5 points
Other countries (8)THMR +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • RISN35.2%
  • THMR78.5%

Securities held

  • RISN52
  • THMR20

Asset class

RISN
Equity
THMR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in RISN51
  • In both1
  • Only in THMR19

Only in RISN

51 securities, 98.3% of RISN by weight

  • Wisdomtree Float19.09%
  • United Parcel-B1.82%
  • Home Depot Inc1.82%

Only in THMR

19 securities, 96.6% of THMR by weight

  • Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF15.71%
  • WisdomTree Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Bullish Fund15.14%
  • ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF USD Class12.00%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in RISN and THMR, widest gap first
HoldingMore in RISNMore in THMR
Exxonmobil HoldiXOMTHMR +1.76 points

All RISN holdings⁠All THMR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RISN vs THMR Cost

Overpaying THMR vs RISN

$6,334

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

  • THMR 1.10%

    $20,291

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RISN 0.72%
  • THMR 1.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530THMR $20,291RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearRISNTHMROverpaying
10$1,284$1,931$647
20$4,888$7,225$2,337
30$13,957$20,291$6,334

Expense ratio

  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • 1.10%THMR
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

THMR 36th cheapest of 46 funds

RISN vs THMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RISN 1.05%
THMR No data
Payout (12M)
RISN $0.32
THMR None
Last payment
RISN $0.08
THMR No data
Ex-dividend
RISN Sep 25, 2026
THMR No data
Paid on
RISN Oct 1, 2026
THMR No data
Frequency
RISN Quarterly
THMR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
THMRAll THMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RISN vs THMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RISN 11.4%THMR No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RISN 0.77THMR No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RISN −21.9%THMR No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RISN 1.08THMR 1.49

Popular comparisons

  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsENDWA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsGMODA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • THMRCvsPTBDA

    THOR AdaptiveRisk Dynamic ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.10% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.