RISN ranks 4th and THMR 33rd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
RISN vs THMR
1.8%by weight
RISN −0.38pt a year
0.72%1.10%
RISN 1.2×the volume
14.8K12.9K
RISN vs THMR Performance
+0.6%+1.6%
- RISN 0.72%, better
- THMR 1.10%
- RISN $70M
- THMR $42M
- RISN +4.8%
- THMR
- RISN 1.05%
- THMR
- RISN 53
- THMR 20
- RISN 14.8K sh, better
- THMR 12.9K sh
- RISN $31.09
- THMR $25.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RISN | THMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76Higher | F22 |
| Mission | A85Higher | A70 |
| Risk | C46Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A80Higher | B68 |
| Durability | B68Higher | D33 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. RISN and THMR are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RISNA
THMRC
In short
RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.
THMR A machine-learning-assisted tactical allocator that roams across stocks, bonds, commodities and alternatives, and is allowed to reach for leveraged ETFs when it wants more punch. Fully active, unconstrained, and priced like it.
Stated mandate
RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.
THMR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed, risk-managed multi-strategy approach. It dynamically allocates among strategies investing in stocks, ETFs and leveraged ETFs across equities, fixed income, commodities and alternatives, using machine-learning-assisted allocation optimization.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RISN vs THMR Holdings
How RISN and THMR differ
1.8%
Shared holdings make up 3.5% of THMR and 1.8% of RISN.
Level by level
- Holdings1.8%
- Country97.7%
Sector
No Sector split for THMR.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in RISNMore in THMR | RISN | THMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | RISN +2.3 points | 100.0% | 97.7% |
| Taiwan | THMR +1.0 points | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Netherlands | THMR +0.5 points | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Other countries (8) | THMR +0.8 points | 0.0% | 0.8% |
Concentration
- RISN35.2%
- THMR78.5%
- RISN52
- THMR20
Asset class
- RISN
- Equity
- THMR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in RISN51
- In both1
- Only in THMR19
Only in RISN
51 securities, 98.3% of RISN by weight
- Wisdomtree Float19.09%
- United Parcel-B1.82%
- Home Depot Inc1.82%
- Nasdaq Inc1.81%
- Cheniere Energy1.81%
- Eog Resources1.79%
- Cintas Corp1.77%
- Republic Svcs1.76%
- Waste Management1.75%
- Csx Corp1.74%
- Nucor Corp1.74%
- Automatic Data1.73%
- Targa Resources1.73%
- Occidental Pete1.72%
- Progressive Corp1.72%
- Norfolk Southern1.72%
- Aflac Inc1.72%
- Crh PLC1.71%
- 3M Co1.71%
- Slb Ltd1.71%
- Kinder Morgan In1.71%
- Fedex Corp1.70%
- United Rentals1.70%
- Simon Property1.69%
- Nextera Energy1.69%
- Carvana Co1.68%
- Intercont Exch I1.68%
- Mondelez Inter-A1.67%
- O'reilly Automot1.63%
- Fastenal Co1.63%
- Linde PLC1.62%
- Iqvia Holdings I1.59%
- Ametek Inc1.55%
- Baker Hughes Co1.52%
- Delta Air Li1.51%
- Southern Copper1.50%
- Valero Energy1.48%
- Western Digital1.48%
- Paccar Inc1.47%
- Freeport-Mcmoran1.47%
- Broadcom Inc1.46%
- Amphenol Corp-A1.45%
- Applovin Co-Cl A1.44%
- Parker Hannifin1.43%
- Interactive Brok1.43%
- Ge Vernova Inc1.37%
- Kla Corp1.31%
- Sandisk Corp1.20%
- Comfort Systems1.19%
- Caterpillar Inc1.17%
Only in THMR
19 securities, 96.6% of THMR by weight
- Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF15.71%
- WisdomTree Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Bullish Fund15.14%
- ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF USD Class12.00%
- State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF USD Class7.67%
- ProShares UltraPro QQQ USD Class7.05%
- Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF4.78%
- NVIDIA Corporation4.29%
- Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF USD Class4.20%
- VanEck Semiconductor ETF USD Class4.11%
- AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund3.34%
- Eli Lilly & Company2.97%
- ProShares Ether ETF USD Class2.91%
- Apple, Inc.2.35%
- Palantir Technologies, Inc.2.32%
- Microsoft Corporation2.19%
- SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF USD Class1.98%
- Meta Platforms, Inc.1.28%
- Amazon.com, Inc.1.26%
- Alphabet, Inc.1.02%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in RISNMore in THMR | RISN | THMR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exxonmobil Holdi | THMR +1.76 points | 1.77% | 3.53% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RISN vs THMR Cost
Overpaying THMR vs RISN
$6,334
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RISN 0.72%
$13,957
THMR 1.10%
$20,291
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RISN | THMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $1,931 | $647 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $7,225 | $2,337 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $20,291 | $6,334 |
- 0.72%RISN, cheaper
- 1.10%THMR
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds
THMR 36th cheapest of 46 funds
RISN vs THMR Dividends
- RISN 1.05%
- THMR
- RISN $0.32
- THMR None
- RISN $0.08
- THMR
- RISN Sep 25, 2026
- THMR
- RISN Oct 1, 2026
- THMR
- RISN Quarterly
- THMR
Distribution history
RISN vs THMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RISN 11.4%THMR
- Return per unit of risk
- RISN 0.77THMR
- Worst fall
- RISN −21.9%THMR
- Market sensitivity
- RISN 1.08THMR 1.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.10% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.