XLK ranks 1st and TDIV 10th of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
TDIV vs XLK
XLK −0.42pt a year
0.50%0.08%
XLK 50.9×the volume
163K8.28M
XLK +6.5pt
+17.2%+23.7%
TDIV vs XLK Performance
+116.5%+130.6%
- TDIV 0.50%
- XLK 0.08%, better
- TDIV $4.35B
- XLK $125B
- TDIV +14.8%
- XLK +20.0%, better
- TDIV 1.39%, better
- XLK 0.47%
- TDIV 88
- XLK 78
- TDIV 163K sh
- XLK 8.28M sh, better
- TDIV $114.06
- XLK $188.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TDIV | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A88Higher | A76 |
| Risk | A80Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | B68 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | C54Higher | C41 |
| Durability | B62 | A82Higher |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. TDIV and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TDIVB
XLKA
In short
TDIV In 2012, "tech dividend" still sounded like a contradiction. TDIV was built around it: roughly 90 technology and telecom payers, weighted by the dollars of dividends they actually hand out rather than by market cap.
XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.
Stated mandate
TDIV The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq Technology Dividend Index. It normally invests at least 90% of assets in securities comprising that index.
XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TDIV vs XLK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TDIV vs XLK Cost
Overpaying TDIV vs XLK
$8,290
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TDIV 0.50%
$9,979
XLK 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TDIV | XLK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $147 | $753 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $575 | $2,885 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,689 | $8,290 |
- 0.50%TDIV
- 0.08%XLK, cheaper
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
XLK cheapest of 23 funds
TDIV 13th cheapest of 23 funds
TDIV vs XLK Dividends
- TDIV 1.39%, better
- XLK 0.47%
- TDIV $1.58
- XLK $0.83
- TDIV $0.35
- XLK $0.22
- TDIV Sep 24, 2026
- XLK Sep 21, 2026
- TDIV Sep 30, 2026
- XLK Sep 23, 2026
- TDIV Quarterly
- XLK Quarterly
Distribution history
TDIV vs XLK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- TDIV
- XLK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TDIV 19.0%, betterXLK 23.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- TDIV 1.24, betterXLK 1.07
- Worst fall
- TDIV −32.0%, betterXLK −33.6%
- Market sensitivity
- TDIV 1.34XLK 1.35
TDIV and XLK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





