TMF ranks 4th and WANT 26th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
TMF vs WANT
TMF −0.10pt a year
0.90%1.00%
TMF 236.1×the volume
5.85M24.8K
WANT +20.8pt
−35.0%−14.2%
TMF vs WANT Performance
−88.4%−53.5%
- TMF 0.90%, better
- WANT 1.00%
- TMF $1.96B
- WANT $20M
- TMF −22.7%
- WANT −11.3%, better
- TMF 4.62%, better
- WANT 0.82%
- TMF 14
- WANT 54
- TMF 5.85M sh, better
- WANT 24.8K sh
- TMF $30.21
- WANT $39.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TMF | WANT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | D25 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | B65Higher | F24 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. TMF and WANT are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TMFA
WANTD
In short
TMF Three times the daily move of long-dated Treasuries, reset every day. Where most 3x funds aim at stocks, TMF points its leverage at the 20-year-plus end of the curve, and has been doing it since 2009.
WANT Direxion's 3x bet on the American shopper. WANT aims for 300% of the daily move in the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, about 60 consumer-facing stocks. A day-trader's tool by design.
Stated mandate
TMF The Fund seeks pre-fee and expense investment results equal to 300% of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It is designed for a single trading day, and longer-period results may differ because daily returns compound.
WANT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TMF vs WANT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TMF vs WANT Cost
Overpaying WANT vs TMF
$1,648
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TMF 0.90%
$17,040
WANT 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TMF | WANT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $1,763 | $170 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $6,625 | $610 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $18,688 | $1,648 |
- 0.90%TMF, cheaper
- 1.00%WANT
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TMF 5th cheapest of 30 funds
WANT 23rd cheapest of 30 funds
TMF vs WANT Dividends
- TMF 4.62%, better
- WANT 0.82%
- TMF $1.40
- WANT $0.36
- TMF $0.35
- WANT $0.15
- TMF Sep 22, 2026
- WANT Sep 22, 2026
- TMF Sep 29, 2026
- WANT Sep 29, 2026
- TMF Quarterly
- WANT Quarterly
Distribution history
TMF vs WANT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- TMF
- WANT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TMF 40.2%, betterWANT 54.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- TMF −0.07WANT 0.54, better
- Worst fall
- TMF −90.9%WANT −85.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- TMF 7.22WANT 3.65
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.