TQQQ ranks 1st and WANT 26th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
TQQQ vs WANT
TQQQ −0.22pt a year
0.78%1.00%
TQQQ 2422.5×the volume
60M24.8K
TQQQ +21.5pt
+7.3%−14.2%
TQQQ vs WANT Performance
+42.2%−53.5%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- WANT 1.00%
- TQQQ $29.1B
- WANT $20M
- TQQQ +9.7%, better
- WANT −11.3%
- TQQQ 0.84%, better
- WANT 0.82%
- TQQQ 116
- WANT 54
- TQQQ 60M sh, better
- WANT 24.8K sh
- TQQQ $52.30
- WANT $39.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TQQQ | WANT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | C47Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | A97Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | B59 | |
| Durability | A79Higher | F24 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. TQQQ and WANT are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TQQQA
WANTD
In short
TQQQ The original 3x Nasdaq-100 trade, live since 2010. Leverage resets every day, chasing three times the index's one-day move, and it is one of the most heavily traded names in its corner of the market.
WANT Direxion's 3x bet on the American shopper. WANT aims for 300% of the daily move in the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, about 60 consumer-facing stocks. A day-trader's tool by design.
Stated mandate
TQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
WANT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TQQQ vs WANT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TQQQ vs WANT Cost
Overpaying WANT vs TQQQ
$3,686
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TQQQ 0.78%
$15,002
WANT 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TQQQ | WANT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,763 | $375 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $6,625 | $1,357 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $18,688 | $3,686 |
- 0.78%TQQQ, cheaper
- 1.00%WANT
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TQQQ 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
WANT 23rd cheapest of 30 funds
TQQQ vs WANT Dividends
- TQQQ 0.84%, better
- WANT 0.82%
- TQQQ $0.48
- WANT $0.36
- TQQQ $0.16
- WANT $0.15
- TQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- WANT Sep 22, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- WANT Sep 29, 2026
- TQQQ Quarterly
- WANT Quarterly
Distribution history
TQQQ vs WANT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- TQQQ
- WANT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TQQQ 56.9%WANT 54.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- TQQQ 0.98, betterWANT 0.54
- Worst fall
- TQQQ −81.7%, betterWANT −85.9%
- Market sensitivity
- TQQQ 3.74WANT 3.65
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.87%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.