FAS ranks 2nd and WANT 26th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
FAS vs WANT
FAS −0.12pt a year
0.88%1.00%
FAS 16.8×the volume
417K24.8K
FAS +21.4pt
+7.2%−14.2%
FAS vs WANT Performance
+41.7%−53.5%
- FAS 0.88%, better
- WANT 1.00%
- FAS $2.08B
- WANT $20M
- FAS +17.0%, better
- WANT −11.3%
- FAS 8.32%, better
- WANT 0.82%
- FAS 87
- WANT 54
- FAS 417K sh, better
- WANT 24.8K sh
- FAS $168.58
- WANT $39.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FAS | WANT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D25 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A73Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | F24 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. FAS and WANT are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FASA
WANTD
In short
FAS Born in November 2008 with the banking system on fire, FAS aims to deliver three times the daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A one-day tool on roughly 80 financial stocks, built around a single-day objective.
WANT Direxion's 3x bet on the American shopper. WANT aims for 300% of the daily move in the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, about 60 consumer-facing stocks. A day-trader's tool by design.
Stated mandate
FAS The fund seeks a daily return equal to three times the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single-day objective rather than a multiple of the index’s cumulative return over longer periods.
WANT The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FAS vs WANT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FAS vs WANT Cost
Overpaying WANT vs FAS
$1,983
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FAS 0.88%
$16,705
WANT 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FAS | WANT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $1,763 | $204 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $6,625 | $734 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $18,688 | $1,983 |
- 0.88%FAS, cheaper
- 1.00%WANT
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
FAS 4th cheapest of 30 funds
WANT 23rd cheapest of 30 funds
FAS vs WANT Dividends
- FAS 8.32%, better
- WANT 0.82%
- FAS $14.62
- WANT $0.36
- FAS $1.00
- WANT $0.15
- FAS Sep 22, 2026
- WANT Sep 22, 2026
- FAS Sep 29, 2026
- WANT Sep 29, 2026
- FAS Quarterly
- WANT Quarterly
Distribution history
FAS vs WANT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FAS
- WANT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FAS 46.3%, betterWANT 54.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FAS 1.03, betterWANT 0.54
- Worst fall
- FAS −66.9%, betterWANT −85.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FAS 2.56WANT 3.65
Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.