GDE ranks 3rd and NTSI 4th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
GDE vs NTSI
GDE −0.08pt a year
0.20%0.28%
GDE 6.6×the volume
125K18.9K
GDE +23.6pt
+40.1%+16.5%
GDE vs NTSI Performance
+3.1%+10.4%
- GDE 0.20%, better
- NTSI 0.28%
- GDE $375M
- NTSI $488M
- GDE +3.1%
- NTSI +10.4%, better
- GDE 16.98%, better
- NTSI 3.11%
- GDE 498
- NTSI 458
- GDE 125K sh, better
- NTSI 18.9K sh
- GDE $51.01
- NTSI $46.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDE | NTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A83 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D25 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | C42 |
| Holdings | B68 | A82Higher |
| Durability | A78Higher | A70 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. GDE and NTSI are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDEB
NTSIB
In short
GDE Gold and US large caps, stacked on the same dollar. GDE holds roughly 500 US large-cap stocks and layers gold futures on top, so the metal rides along instead of crowding equities out of the portfolio.
NTSI Developed-market stocks and a U.S. Treasury futures sleeve sharing one seat. NTSI is WisdomTree's capital-efficient playbook pointed overseas: the stock exposure and the bond exposure don't have to compete for the same dollar.
Stated mandate
GDE The fund seeks total return by investing directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary in U.S.-listed gold futures contracts and U.S. large-cap equity securities.
NTSI The Fund seeks total return through international equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. WisdomTree presents it as a capital-efficient balanced strategy intended to provide international equity exposure with Treasury-futures diversification.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDE vs NTSI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDE vs NTSI Cost
Overpaying NTSI vs GDE
$1,600
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDE 0.20%
$4,155
NTSI 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDE | NTSI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $509 | $144 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $1,976 | $555 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $5,755 | $1,600 |
- 0.20%GDE, cheaper
- 0.28%NTSI
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
GDE 2nd cheapest of 19 funds
NTSI 4th cheapest of 19 funds
GDE vs NTSI Dividends
- GDE 16.98%, better
- NTSI 3.11%
- GDE $8.73
- NTSI $1.45
- GDE $8.58
- NTSI $0.01
- GDE Oct 27, 2026
- NTSI Sep 25, 2026
- GDE Oct 29, 2026
- NTSI Sep 29, 2026
- GDE Annual
- NTSI Quarterly
Distribution history
GDE vs NTSI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDE 20.7%NTSI 12.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GDE 1.58, betterNTSI 0.99
- Worst fall
- GDE −32.0%NTSI −33.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GDE 1.00NTSI 0.93
GDE and NTSI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
