FELG ranks 4th and ATFV 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
ATFV vs FELG
FELG −0.38pt a year
0.56%0.18%
FELG 6.7×the volume
56.6K379K
ATFV vs FELG Performance
−2.9%−1.7%
- ATFV 0.56%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- ATFV $941M
- FELG $5.78B
- ATFV −2.9%
- FELG −1.7%, better
- ATFV 0.20%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- ATFV 36
- FELG 132
- ATFV 56.6K sh
- FELG 379K sh, better
- ATFV $35.25
- FELG $42.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ATFV | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B61 | A82Higher |
| Risk | D35 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | C52Higher |
| Durability | A83 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. ATFV and FELG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ATFVC
FELGA
In short
ATFV Alger's best-ideas book: roughly 35 high-conviction growth names, and one of the few ETFs that keeps its holdings confidential, pricing off a verified value published every second instead. The 35 is a memorial to colleagues lost on 9/11.
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
Stated mandate
ATFV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of approximately 35 stocks selected as the manager’s best ideas in highly disrupted market segments.
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ATFV vs FELG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ATFV vs FELG Cost
Overpaying ATFV vs FELG
$7,339
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ATFV 0.56%
$11,088
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ATFV | FELG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,006 | $328 | $678 |
| 20 | $3,855 | $1,281 | $2,574 |
| 30 | $11,088 | $3,749 | $7,339 |
- 0.56%ATFV
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
ATFV 47th cheapest of 90 funds
ATFV vs FELG Dividends
- ATFV 0.20%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- ATFV $0.07
- FELG $0.16
- ATFV $0.07
- FELG $0.04
- ATFV Dec 18, 2025
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- ATFV Dec 31, 2025
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- ATFV Annual
- FELG Quarterly
Distribution history
ATFV vs FELG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ATFV 24.7%FELG 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ATFV 1.22FELG 0.93
- Worst fall
- ATFV −45.3%FELG −23.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ATFV 1.59FELG 1.23
ATFV and FELG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
