Skip to content

ATFV vs LRGC

Alger 35 ETF

ATFVCNYSE Arca

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.17pt a year

ATFV0.56%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

ATFV 1.7×the volume

ATFV56.6KLRGC34.1K

3Y return · a year

ATFV +13.8pt

ATFV+34.2%LRGC+20.4%

ATFV vs LRGC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.9%ATFV+9.2%LRGC

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. ATFV −2.9%. LRGC +9.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%5%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ATFV 0.56%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
ATFV $941M
LRGC $1.35B
1Y total return
ATFV −2.9%
LRGC +9.2%, better
Yield (12M)
ATFV 0.20%
LRGC 0.53%, better
Holdings
ATFV 36
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
ATFV 56.6K sh, better
LRGC 34.1K sh
NAV per share
ATFV $35.25
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ATFV: Cost 47, Risk 35, Mission 61, Tradability 47, Holdings 48, Durability 83. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for ATFV, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarATFVLRGC
Cost30% weightC47A82Higher
Mission25% weightB61A79Higher
Risk15% weightD35A90Higher
Tradability15% weightC47A75Higher
Holdings10% weightC48A77Higher
Durability5% weightA83HigherA78

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ATFV and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and ATFV 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 48CCARKCastleArk Large Growth ETFScore 47
  6. Rank 50CATFVAlger 35 ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 50CBAMGBrookstone Growth Stock ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ATFVCAlger 35 ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

ATFV Alger's best-ideas book: roughly 35 high-conviction growth names, and one of the few ETFs that keeps its holdings confidential, pricing off a verified value published every second instead. The 35 is a memorial to colleagues lost on 9/11.

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

ATFV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of approximately 35 stocks selected as the manager’s best ideas in highly disrupted market segments.

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • ATFV Real conviction, not closet indexing. About 40 holdings of any market cap, chosen as the firm's best ideas in the most disrupted segments of the market, with a documented tilt toward technology.alger.comsec.gov
  • 0.56% net of a waiver through December 31, 2027 (0.77% gross), which lands near the category median. Modest pricing for a concentrated, non-transparent active mandate, and the fund has grown into the multi-billion-dollar tier.
  • The confidential-account structure lets the manager build and exit positions without the market reading over its shoulder. SEC staff note most active ETFs disclose holdings daily; this one does not.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • The 35-stock count is deliberate: Alger named the fund for the 35 colleagues the firm lost in the September 11 attacks.alger.com
  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • ATFV No daily holdings list. You trade against a per-second indicative value, and Alger's own disclosure warns shares may carry wider bid/ask spreads than fully transparent ETFs, especially in volatile markets.alger.comsec.gov
  • Non-diversified by design, so one position can move results far more than in a broad index fund, and the technology focus concentrates the ride further.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • That 0.56% rate leans on a waiver through December 31, 2027; gross is 0.77%. Top-scoring peers such as JUSA and FELG charge 0.18%, so you are paying up for the stock picking.
  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full ATFV profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

ATFV vs LRGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ATFV vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying ATFV vs LRGC

$3,190

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ATFV 0.56%

    $11,088

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ATFV 0.56%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530ATFV $11,088LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearATFVLRGCOverpaying
10$1,006$705$301
20$3,855$2,725$1,130
30$11,088$7,898$3,190

Expense ratio

  • 0.56%ATFV
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

ATFV 47th cheapest of 90 funds

ATFV vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
ATFV 0.20%
LRGC 0.53%, better
Payout (12M)
ATFV $0.07
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
ATFV $0.07
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
ATFV Dec 18, 2025
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
ATFV Dec 31, 2025
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
ATFV Annual
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

ATFVAnnual · 4 paymentsAll ATFV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2022 $0.0074; Dec 20, 2023 $0.0015; Dec 18, 2024 $0.04; Dec 18, 2025 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ATFV vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ATFV 24.7%LRGC 12.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ATFV 1.22LRGC 1.26, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ATFV −45.3%LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ATFV 1.59LRGC 1.00

ATFV and LRGC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ATFVCvsJUSAA

    Alger 35 ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ATFVCvsGUSEA

    Alger 35 ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ATFVCvsFELGA

    Alger 35 ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.56% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.