JUSA ranks 1st and ATFV 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
ATFV vs JUSA
JUSA −0.38pt a year
0.56%0.18%
JUSA 1.7×the volume
56.6K98.8K
ATFV vs JUSA Performance
−2.9%+10.3%
- ATFV 0.56%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- ATFV $941M
- JUSA $745M
- ATFV −2.9%
- JUSA +10.3%, better
- ATFV 0.20%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- ATFV 36
- JUSA 265
- ATFV 56.6K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- ATFV $35.25
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ATFV | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A99Higher |
| Mission | B61 | A84Higher |
| Risk | D35 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A76 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. ATFV and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ATFVC
JUSAA
In short
ATFV Alger's best-ideas book: roughly 35 high-conviction growth names, and one of the few ETFs that keeps its holdings confidential, pricing off a verified value published every second instead. The 35 is a memorial to colleagues lost on 9/11.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
ATFV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of approximately 35 stocks selected as the manager’s best ideas in highly disrupted market segments.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ATFV vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ATFV vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying ATFV vs JUSA
$7,339
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ATFV 0.56%
$11,088
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ATFV | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,006 | $328 | $678 |
| 20 | $3,855 | $1,281 | $2,574 |
| 30 | $11,088 | $3,749 | $7,339 |
- 0.56%ATFV
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
ATFV 47th cheapest of 90 funds
ATFV vs JUSA Dividends
- ATFV 0.20%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- ATFV $0.07
- JUSA $0.49
- ATFV $0.07
- JUSA $0.13
- ATFV Dec 18, 2025
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- ATFV Dec 31, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- ATFV Annual
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
ATFV vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ATFV 24.7%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ATFV 1.22JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- ATFV −45.3%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- ATFV 1.59JUSA 0.98
ATFV and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.56% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

