GUSE ranks 2nd and ATFV 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
ATFV vs GUSE
GUSE −0.26pt a year
0.56%0.30%
ATFV 2.3×the volume
56.6K24.9K
ATFV vs GUSE Performance
+1.3%+11.3%
- ATFV 0.56%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- ATFV $941M
- GUSE $413M
- ATFV −2.9%
- GUSE
- ATFV 0.20%
- GUSE
- ATFV 36
- GUSE 122
- ATFV 56.6K sh, better
- GUSE 24.9K sh
- ATFV $35.25
- GUSE $45.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ATFV | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A97Higher |
| Mission | B61 | |
| Risk | D35 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | C47Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | C48 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A83 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. ATFV and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ATFVC
GUSEA
In short
ATFV Alger's best-ideas book: roughly 35 high-conviction growth names, and one of the few ETFs that keeps its holdings confidential, pricing off a verified value published every second instead. The 35 is a memorial to colleagues lost on 9/11.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
ATFV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of approximately 35 stocks selected as the manager’s best ideas in highly disrupted market segments.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ATFV vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ATFV vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying ATFV vs GUSE
$4,939
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ATFV 0.56%
$11,088
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ATFV | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,006 | $545 | $461 |
| 20 | $3,855 | $2,113 | $1,742 |
| 30 | $11,088 | $6,149 | $4,939 |
- 0.56%ATFV
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
ATFV 47th cheapest of 90 funds
ATFV vs GUSE Dividends
- ATFV 0.20%
- GUSE
- ATFV $0.07
- GUSE
- ATFV $0.07
- GUSE $0.30
- ATFV Dec 18, 2025
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- ATFV Dec 31, 2025
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- ATFV Annual
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
ATFV vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ATFV 24.7%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- ATFV 1.22GUSE
- Worst fall
- ATFV −45.3%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- ATFV 1.59GUSE 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.