FELG ranks 4th and BAMG 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
BAMG vs FELG
FELG −0.65pt a year
0.83%0.18%
FELG 22.1×the volume
17.1K379K
BAMG vs FELG Performance
+9.4%−1.7%
- BAMG 0.83%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- BAMG $132M
- FELG $5.78B
- BAMG +9.4%, better
- FELG −1.7%
- BAMG 0.01%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- BAMG 102
- FELG 132
- BAMG 17.1K sh
- FELG 379K sh, better
- BAMG $43.70
- FELG $42.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMG | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A89Higher | A82 |
| Risk | A82Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | B60 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A80Higher | C52 |
| Durability | C45 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. BAMG and FELG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMGC
FELGA
In short
BAMG Brookstone's team picks roughly 80 US companies it believes have the strongest earnings growth ahead. No index to hug, no 500-name safety blanket. Conviction growth at 0.83% a year.
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
Stated mandate
BAMG The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMG vs FELG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMG vs FELG Cost
Overpaying BAMG vs FELG
$12,110
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMG 0.83%
$15,859
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMG | FELG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,474 | $328 | $1,146 |
| 20 | $5,581 | $1,281 | $4,300 |
| 30 | $15,859 | $3,749 | $12,110 |
- 0.83%BAMG
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
BAMG 80th cheapest of 90 funds
BAMG vs FELG Dividends
- BAMG 0.01%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- BAMG $0.0043
- FELG $0.16
- BAMG $0.0043
- FELG $0.04
- BAMG Aug 28, 2026
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- BAMG Sep 4, 2026
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- BAMG Irregular
- FELG Quarterly
Distribution history
BAMG vs FELG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMG 14.9%FELG 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMG 1.13FELG 0.93
- Worst fall
- BAMG −21.0%FELG −23.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMG 1.14FELG 1.23
BAMG and FELG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.83% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
