LRGC ranks 3rd and BAMG 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
BAMG vs LRGC
LRGC −0.44pt a year
0.83%0.39%
LRGC 2.0×the volume
17.1K34.1K
BAMG +0.4pt
+20.8%+20.4%
BAMG vs LRGC Performance
+9.4%+9.2%
- BAMG 0.83%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- BAMG $132M
- LRGC $1.35B
- BAMG +9.4%, better
- LRGC +9.2%
- BAMG 0.01%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- BAMG 102
- LRGC 72
- BAMG 17.1K sh
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- BAMG $43.70
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMG | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A89Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A82 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A80Higher | A77 |
| Durability | C45 | A78Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. BAMG and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMGC
LRGCA
In short
BAMG Brookstone's team picks roughly 80 US companies it believes have the strongest earnings growth ahead. No index to hug, no 500-name safety blanket. Conviction growth at 0.83% a year.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
BAMG The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMG vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMG vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying BAMG vs LRGC
$7,961
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMG 0.83%
$15,859
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMG | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,474 | $705 | $769 |
| 20 | $5,581 | $2,725 | $2,856 |
| 30 | $15,859 | $7,898 | $7,961 |
- 0.83%BAMG
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
BAMG 80th cheapest of 90 funds
BAMG vs LRGC Dividends
- BAMG 0.01%
- LRGC 0.53%, better
- BAMG $0.0043
- LRGC $0.45
- BAMG $0.0043
- LRGC $0.45
- BAMG Aug 28, 2026
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- BAMG Sep 4, 2026
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- BAMG Irregular
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
BAMG vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMG 14.9%LRGC 12.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMG 1.13LRGC 1.26, better
- Worst fall
- BAMG −21.0%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMG 1.14LRGC 1.00
BAMG and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.83% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
