JUSA ranks 1st and BAMG 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
BAMG vs JUSA
JUSA −0.65pt a year
0.83%0.18%
JUSA 5.8×the volume
17.1K98.8K
BAMG vs JUSA Performance
+9.4%+10.3%
- BAMG 0.83%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- BAMG $132M
- JUSA $745M
- BAMG +9.4%
- JUSA +10.3%, better
- BAMG 0.01%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- BAMG 102
- JUSA 265
- BAMG 17.1K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- BAMG $43.70
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMG | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A89Higher | A84 |
| Risk | A82 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A80 | A83Higher |
| Durability | C45 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. BAMG and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMGC
JUSAA
In short
BAMG Brookstone's team picks roughly 80 US companies it believes have the strongest earnings growth ahead. No index to hug, no 500-name safety blanket. Conviction growth at 0.83% a year.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
BAMG The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMG vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMG vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying BAMG vs JUSA
$12,110
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMG 0.83%
$15,859
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMG | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,474 | $328 | $1,146 |
| 20 | $5,581 | $1,281 | $4,300 |
| 30 | $15,859 | $3,749 | $12,110 |
- 0.83%BAMG
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
BAMG 80th cheapest of 90 funds
BAMG vs JUSA Dividends
- BAMG 0.01%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- BAMG $0.0043
- JUSA $0.49
- BAMG $0.0043
- JUSA $0.13
- BAMG Aug 28, 2026
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- BAMG Sep 4, 2026
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- BAMG Irregular
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
BAMG vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMG 14.9%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMG 1.13JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- BAMG −21.0%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMG 1.14JUSA 0.98
BAMG and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.83% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

