Skip to content

BAMG vs GUSE

Brookstone Growth Stock ETF

BAMGCCboe

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.53pt a year

BAMG0.83%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 1.5×the volume

BAMG17.1KGUSE24.9K

BAMG vs GUSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+8.2%BAMG+11.3%GUSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BAMG +8.2%. GUSE +11.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BAMG 0.83%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
BAMG $132M
GUSE $413M
1Y total return
BAMG +9.4%
GUSE No data
Yield (12M)
BAMG 0.01%
GUSE No data
Holdings
BAMG 102
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
BAMG 17.1K sh
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
NAV per share
BAMG $43.70
GUSE $45.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BAMG: Cost 11, Risk 82, Mission 89, Tradability 60, Holdings 80, Durability 45. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for BAMG, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBAMGGUSE
Cost30% weightF11A97Higher
Mission25% weightA89Not scored
Risk15% weightA82A94Higher
Tradability15% weightB60HigherC46
Holdings10% weightA80A89Higher
Durability5% weightC45A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BAMG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and BAMG 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 50CATFVAlger 35 ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 50CBAMGBrookstone Growth Stock ETFScore 46
  6. Rank 50CBASGBrown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BAMGCBrookstone Growth Stock ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

BAMG Brookstone's team picks roughly 80 US companies it believes have the strongest earnings growth ahead. No index to hug, no 500-name safety blanket. Conviction growth at 0.83% a year.

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

BAMG The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

  • BAMG No benchmark to hide behind: managers build the book from their own earnings-growth research, holding roughly 80 US stocks rather than a few hundred index names.
  • Stays in its lane. The portfolio has hewed closely to its stated US growth-equity mandate, with no drift into bonds, foreign markets, or off-label bets.
  • Diversified by design: roughly 80 positions spread across sectors, not a three-stock bet dressed up as a strategy.
  • Live since 2023, so there is real-money history to inspect instead of a backtest.
  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

  • BAMG Costs 0.83% a year, above the category norm. Index-plus rivals FELG and JUSA charge 0.18%, so the stock picking carries a visible hurdle.
  • Thinly traded next to category heavyweights, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads and more slippage on larger orders.
  • Distributions arrive once or twice a year. The stated objective is capital appreciation, not income.
  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full BAMG profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

BAMG vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAMG vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying BAMG vs GUSE

$9,710

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BAMG 0.83%

    $15,859

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BAMG 0.83%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BAMG $15,859GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearBAMGGUSEOverpaying
10$1,474$545$929
20$5,581$2,113$3,468
30$15,859$6,149$9,710

Expense ratio

  • 0.83%BAMG
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

BAMG 80th cheapest of 90 funds

BAMG vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
BAMG 0.01%
GUSE No data
Payout (12M)
BAMG $0.0043
GUSE No data
Last payment
BAMG $0.0043
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
BAMG Aug 28, 2026
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
BAMG Sep 4, 2026
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
BAMG Irregular
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BAMGIrregular · 6 paymentsAll BAMG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Nov 29, 2023 $0.01; Dec 26, 2023 $0.02; Aug 30, 2024 $0.0065; Nov 29, 2024 $0.01; Dec 27, 2024 $0.40; Aug 28, 2026 $0.0043. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

BAMG vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BAMG 14.9%GUSE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BAMG 1.13GUSE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BAMG −21.0%since Sep 2023GUSE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BAMG 1.14GUSE 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • BAMGCvsJUSAA

    Brookstone Growth Stock ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.83% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMGCvsLRGCA

    Brookstone Growth Stock ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.83% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMGCvsFELGA

    Brookstone Growth Stock ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.83% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.