GUSE ranks 2nd and BAMG 50th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
BAMG vs GUSE
GUSE −0.53pt a year
0.83%0.30%
GUSE 1.5×the volume
17.1K24.9K
BAMG vs GUSE Performance
+8.2%+11.3%
- BAMG 0.83%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- BAMG $132M
- GUSE $413M
- BAMG +9.4%
- GUSE
- BAMG 0.01%
- GUSE
- BAMG 102
- GUSE 122
- BAMG 17.1K sh
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- BAMG $43.70
- GUSE $45.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMG | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | A82 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A80 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C45 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. BAMG and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMGC
GUSEA
In short
BAMG Brookstone's team picks roughly 80 US companies it believes have the strongest earnings growth ahead. No index to hug, no 500-name safety blanket. Conviction growth at 0.83% a year.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
BAMG The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMG vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMG vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying BAMG vs GUSE
$9,710
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMG 0.83%
$15,859
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMG | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,474 | $545 | $929 |
| 20 | $5,581 | $2,113 | $3,468 |
| 30 | $15,859 | $6,149 | $9,710 |
- 0.83%BAMG
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
BAMG 80th cheapest of 90 funds
BAMG vs GUSE Dividends
- BAMG 0.01%
- GUSE
- BAMG $0.0043
- GUSE
- BAMG $0.0043
- GUSE $0.30
- BAMG Aug 28, 2026
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- BAMG Sep 4, 2026
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- BAMG Irregular
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
BAMG vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMG 14.9%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMG 1.13GUSE
- Worst fall
- BAMG −21.0%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- BAMG 1.14GUSE 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.83% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.