ROM ranks 3rd and BTGD 84th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
BTGD vs ROM
ROM −0.16pt a year
1.09%0.93%
ROM 2.1×the volume
23K47.7K
BTGD vs ROM Performance
−44.9%+26.5%
- BTGD 1.09%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- BTGD $46M
- ROM $1.15B
- BTGD −44.9%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- BTGD 5.12%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- BTGD 4
- ROM 85
- BTGD 23K sh
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- BTGD $24.69
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTGD | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | A70Higher |
| Mission | F16 | |
| Risk | F24 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | D32 | |
| Durability | B60 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. BTGD and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTGDD
ROMA
In short
BTGD One ticker, two hard-money bets: every dollar in targets about a dollar of bitcoin exposure and a dollar of gold exposure, stacked on top of each other with futures inside a 1940 Act fund.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
BTGD The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed strategy combining bitcoin and gold exposures, obtained through U.S.-listed futures contracts and pooled investment vehicles.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTGD vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTGD vs ROM Cost
Overpaying BTGD vs ROM
$2,594
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTGD 1.09%
$20,133
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTGD | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,915 | $1,644 | $271 |
| 20 | $7,166 | $6,199 | $967 |
| 30 | $20,133 | $17,539 | $2,594 |
- 1.09%BTGD
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
BTGD 82nd cheapest of 95 funds
BTGD vs ROM Dividends
- BTGD 5.12%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- BTGD $1.15
- ROM $0.04
- BTGD $1.15
- ROM $0.02
- BTGD Dec 30, 2025
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- BTGD Dec 31, 2025
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- BTGD Irregular
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
BTGD vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTGD 54.5%ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTGD 0.27ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- BTGD −58.8%ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BTGD 1.84ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 1.09% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.