Skip to content

CAML vs FELG

Congress Large Cap Growth ETF

CAMLCNYSE Arca

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

FELGANYSE Arca

Overlap

47.4%by weight

Expense ratio

FELG −0.47pt a year

CAML0.65%FELG0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

FELG 15.3×the volume

CAML24.8KFELG379K

CAML vs FELG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.3%CAML−1.7%FELG

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CAML −2.3%. FELG −1.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%5%10%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CAML 0.65%
FELG 0.18%, better
Fund size
CAML $370M
FELG $5.78B
1Y total return
CAML −2.3%
FELG −1.7%, better
Yield (12M)
CAML 0.00%
FELG 0.37%, better
Holdings
CAML 38
FELG 132
Avg volume (30D)
CAML 24.8K sh
FELG 379K sh, better
NAV per share
CAML $39.02
FELG $42.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CAML: Cost 26, Risk 54, Mission 49, Tradability 62, Holdings 76, Durability 66. FELG: Cost 99, Risk 51, Mission 82, Tradability 85, Holdings 52, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for CAML, FELG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCAMLFELG
Cost30% weightD26A99Higher
Mission25% weightC49A82Higher
Risk15% weightC54HigherC51
Tradability15% weightB62A85Higher
Holdings10% weightA76HigherC52
Durability5% weightB66A95Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CAML and FELG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

FELG ranks 4th and CAML 44th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 5AGQQQAstoria US Quality Growth Kings ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 44CBGUSBaillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth ETFScore 48
  7. Rank 44CCAMLCongress Large Cap Growth ETFScore 48
  8. Rank 44CPRCSParnassus Core Select ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CAMLCCongress Large Cap Growth ETF

FELGAFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

In short

CAML An active large-cap growth picker that blends growth, momentum and value signals and treats the Russell 1000 Growth as a yardstick, not a blueprint. Launched in 2023, and priced above most of its peer group for that human judgment.

FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.

Stated mandate

CAML Its stated objective is long-term capital appreciation.

FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.

Why people hold it

  • CAML Genuinely active: holdings come from Congress's own multi-factor screen spanning growth, momentum and value, with the Russell 1000 Growth as the reference point rather than a template.
  • Past the fragile startup stage. Since its 2023 launch it has gathered hundreds of millions, which is more than most young active ETFs manage.
  • Simple plumbing: a standard 1940 Act stock fund. No leverage resets, no K-1 at tax time, no derivatives wrapper to decode.
  • FELG 0.18% a year, roughly a third of the typical fee among active US growth-conviction funds.
  • Not a moonshot: at least 80% of assets sit in Russell 1000 Growth constituents across about 110 stocks, so the manager's bets are tilts around a familiar benchmark.fidelity.com
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and cheaper than most of the other top-graded names there (GUSE and MAGS at 0.30%, LRGC at 0.39%).
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund from Fidelity with steady on-screen liquidity, and it pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • CAML At 0.65% it runs above the typical fund in its peer group, and rivals benchmarked to the same index charge less (ACGR 0.39%, PGRO 0.50%, FFOG 0.41%).
  • Thinly traded next to the category's heavyweights, so wider bid-ask spreads come with the territory, especially around the open and in fast markets.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually. The mandate is capital appreciation, not a regular income stream.
  • FELG Concentrated by design: roughly 110 large-cap growth names, so the megacap tech leaders at the top of the Russell 1000 Growth Index drive the ride both ways.
  • Active means the portfolio deviates from the index on purpose, so results can land on either side of it.
  • Not the cheapest seat in the cohort: JUSA runs 0.12%, though its mandate is broad large-cap rather than the growth slice.

Full CAML profile⁠

Full FELG profile⁠

CAML vs FELG Holdings

How CAML and FELG differ

Overlap by weight

47.4%

Shared holdings make up 72.1% of CAML and 64.8% of FELG.

Level by level

  • Holdings23 in both47.4%
  • Sector11 Sectors84.8%
  • Countryby domicile95.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CAML and FELG, widest gap first
SectorMore in CAMLMore in FELG
TechnologyFELG +7.9 points
CommunicationFELG +5.8 points
IndustrialsCAML +3.1 points
Real EstateCAML +2.5 points
FinancialsCAML +2.4 points
Consumer StaplesCAML +2.1 points
EnergyCAML +1.9 points
MaterialsCAML +1.6 points
Health CareFELG +1.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryCAML +1.4 points
UtilitiesSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CAML and FELG, widest gap first
CountryMore in CAMLMore in FELG
United StatesFELG +4.8 points
NetherlandsCAML +2.4 points
CanadaCAML +2.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CAML44.6%
  • FELG57.9%

Securities held

  • CAML38
  • FELG131

Asset class

CAML
Equity
FELG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CAML15
  • In both23
  • Only in FELG108

Only in CAML

15 securities, 28.0% of CAML by weight

  • Welltower Inc2.84%
  • Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc2.42%
  • Shopify Inc2.32%

Only in FELG

108 securities, 34.5% of FELG by weight

  • Alphabet Inc Class C2.65%
  • Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.10%
  • Mastercard Inc Class A1.93%

Weight gaps

All 23 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CAML and FELG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CAMLMore in FELG
NVIDIA CorpNVDAFELG +7.63 points
Arista Networks IncANETCAML +2.57 points
Costco Wholesale CorpCOSTCAML +2.52 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNCAML +2.34 points
Amphenol CorpAPHCAML +2.30 points
Apple IncAAPLFELG +2.29 points
Parker-Hannifin CorpPHCAML +2.10 points
MongoDB IncMDBCAML +2.07 points

All CAML holdings⁠All 109 FELG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CAML vs FELG Cost

Overpaying CAML vs FELG

$8,968

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CAML 0.65%

    $12,717

  • FELG 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CAML 0.65%
  • FELG 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CAML $12,717FELG $3,749

Year by year

YearCAMLFELGOverpaying
10$1,163$328$835
20$4,440$1,281$3,159
30$12,717$3,749$8,968

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CAML
  • 0.18%FELG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

FELG cheapest of 90 funds

CAML 65th cheapest of 90 funds

CAML vs FELG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CAML 0.00%
FELG 0.37%, better
Payout (12M)
CAML $0.00035
FELG $0.16
Last payment
CAML $0.00035
FELG $0.04
Ex-dividend
CAML Dec 11, 2025
FELG Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
CAML Dec 15, 2025
FELG Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
CAML Annual
FELG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CAMLAnnual · 4 paymentsAll CAML payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 11, 2023 $0.02; Dec 27, 2023 $0.02; Dec 12, 2024 $0.02; Dec 11, 2025 $0.00035. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD
FELGQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll FELG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 13, 2023 $0.14; Nov 14, 2023 $0.04; Dec 28, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.03; Jun 21, 2024 $0.05; Sep 20, 2024 $0.04; Dec 20, 2024 $0.05; Mar 21, 2025 $0.04; Jun 20, 2025 $0.04; Sep 19, 2025 $0.04; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.03; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Sep 18, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.1020232026YTD

CAML vs FELG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CAML 14.7%FELG 16.3%since Dec 2023
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CAML 0.86FELG 0.93since Dec 2023
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CAML −21.1%since Aug 2023FELG −23.9%since Nov 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CAML 1.10FELG 1.23

CAML and FELG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CAMLCvsJUSAA

    Congress Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsJUSAA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CAMLCvsGUSEA

    Congress Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsGUSEA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CAMLCvsLRGCA

    Congress Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FELGAvsLRGCA

    Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.