GUSE ranks 2nd and CAML 44th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
CAML vs GUSE
GUSE −0.35pt a year
0.65%0.30%
GUSE 1.01×the volume
24.8K24.9K
CAML vs GUSE Performance
+1.5%+11.3%
- CAML 0.65%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- CAML $370M
- GUSE $413M
- CAML −2.3%
- GUSE
- CAML 0.00%
- GUSE
- CAML 38
- GUSE 122
- CAML 24.8K sh
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- CAML $39.02
- GUSE $45.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAML | GUSE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A97Higher |
| Mission | C49 | |
| Risk | C54 | A94Higher |
| Tradability | B62Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A76 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A85Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. CAML and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAMLC
GUSEA
In short
CAML An active large-cap growth picker that blends growth, momentum and value signals and treats the Russell 1000 Growth as a yardstick, not a blueprint. Launched in 2023, and priced above most of its peer group for that human judgment.
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
Stated mandate
CAML Its stated objective is long-term capital appreciation.
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAML vs GUSE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAML vs GUSE Cost
Overpaying CAML vs GUSE
$6,568
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAML 0.65%
$12,717
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAML | GUSE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $545 | $618 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,113 | $2,327 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $6,149 | $6,568 |
- 0.65%CAML
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
CAML 65th cheapest of 90 funds
CAML vs GUSE Dividends
- CAML 0.00%
- GUSE
- CAML $0.00035
- GUSE
- CAML $0.00035
- GUSE $0.30
- CAML Dec 11, 2025
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- CAML Dec 15, 2025
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- CAML Annual
- GUSE Irregular
Distribution history
CAML vs GUSE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAML 14.7%GUSE
- Return per unit of risk
- CAML 0.86GUSE
- Worst fall
- CAML −21.1%GUSE
- Market sensitivity
- CAML 1.10GUSE 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.