Skip to content

CAML vs JUSA

Congress Large Cap Growth ETF

CAMLCNYSE Arca

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

41.8%by weight

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.47pt a year

CAML0.65%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 4.0×the volume

CAML24.8KJUSA98.8K

CAML vs JUSA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.3%CAML+10.3%JUSA

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. CAML −2.3%. JUSA +10.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%5%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CAML 0.65%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
CAML $370M
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
CAML −2.3%
JUSA +10.3%, better
Yield (12M)
CAML 0.00%
JUSA 0.72%, better
Holdings
CAML 38
JUSA 265
Avg volume (30D)
CAML 24.8K sh
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
NAV per share
CAML $39.02
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CAML: Cost 26, Risk 54, Mission 49, Tradability 62, Holdings 76, Durability 66. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 59, Holdings 83, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for CAML, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCAMLJUSA
Cost30% weightD26A99Higher
Mission25% weightC49A84Higher
Risk15% weightC54A92Higher
Tradability15% weightB62HigherB59
Holdings10% weightA76A83Higher
Durability5% weightB66A76Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CAML and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and CAML 44th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 44CBGUSBaillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth ETFScore 48
  4. Rank 44CCAMLCongress Large Cap Growth ETFScore 48
  5. Rank 44CPRCSParnassus Core Select ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CAMLCCongress Large Cap Growth ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

CAML An active large-cap growth picker that blends growth, momentum and value signals and treats the Russell 1000 Growth as a yardstick, not a blueprint. Launched in 2023, and priced above most of its peer group for that human judgment.

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

CAML Its stated objective is long-term capital appreciation.

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

  • CAML Genuinely active: holdings come from Congress's own multi-factor screen spanning growth, momentum and value, with the Russell 1000 Growth as the reference point rather than a template.
  • Past the fragile startup stage. Since its 2023 launch it has gathered hundreds of millions, which is more than most young active ETFs manage.
  • Simple plumbing: a standard 1940 Act stock fund. No leverage resets, no K-1 at tax time, no derivatives wrapper to decode.
  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

  • CAML At 0.65% it runs above the typical fund in its peer group, and rivals benchmarked to the same index charge less (ACGR 0.39%, PGRO 0.50%, FFOG 0.41%).
  • Thinly traded next to the category's heavyweights, so wider bid-ask spreads come with the territory, especially around the open and in fast markets.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually. The mandate is capital appreciation, not a regular income stream.
  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full CAML profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

CAML vs JUSA Holdings

How CAML and JUSA differ

Overlap by weight

41.8%

Shared holdings make up 80.8% of CAML and 43.5% of JUSA.

Level by level

  • Holdings27 in both41.8%
  • Sector11 Sectors84.7%
  • Countryby domicile95.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in CAML and JUSA, widest gap first
SectorMore in CAMLMore in JUSA
TechnologyCAML +10.1 points
Health CareJUSA +4.4 points
IndustrialsCAML +3.7 points
FinancialsJUSA +3.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryJUSA +2.0 points
UtilitiesJUSA +1.9 points
Consumer StaplesJUSA +1.4 points
EnergyJUSA +1.2 points
CommunicationJUSA +1.2 points
Real EstateCAML +0.9 points
MaterialsCAML +0.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CAML and JUSA, widest gap first
CountryMore in CAMLMore in JUSA
United StatesJUSA +4.7 points
NetherlandsCAML +2.4 points
CanadaCAML +2.4 points
Other countries (2)JUSA +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CAML44.6%
  • JUSA37.4%

Securities held

  • CAML38
  • JUSA263

Asset class

CAML
Equity
JUSA
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CAML11
  • In both27
  • Only in JUSA236

Only in CAML

11 securities, 19.3% of CAML by weight

  • Shopify Inc2.32%
  • ASML Holding NV2.28%
  • Williams Cos Inc/The2.25%

Only in JUSA

236 securities, 56.3% of JUSA by weight

  • Alphabet Inc-Cl C -1.93%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.39%
  • Exxonmobil Holdings Corp1.37%

Weight gaps

All 27 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CAML and JUSA, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CAMLMore in JUSA
Welltower IncWELLCAML +2.76 points
Amphenol CorpAPHCAML +2.64 points
Arista Networks IncANETCAML +2.61 points
Alphabet IncGOOGLCAML +2.22 points
Hilton Worldwide Holdings IncHLTCAML +2.20 points
GE Vernova IncGEVCAML +2.19 points
Parker-Hannifin CorpPHCAML +2.12 points
Ecolab IncECLCAML +2.08 points

All CAML holdings⁠All 261 JUSA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CAML vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying CAML vs JUSA

$8,968

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CAML 0.65%

    $12,717

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CAML 0.65%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CAML $12,717JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearCAMLJUSAOverpaying
10$1,163$328$835
20$4,440$1,281$3,159
30$12,717$3,749$8,968

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CAML
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

CAML 65th cheapest of 90 funds

CAML vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
CAML 0.00%
JUSA 0.72%, better
Payout (12M)
CAML $0.00035
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
CAML $0.00035
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
CAML Dec 11, 2025
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
CAML Dec 15, 2025
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
CAML Annual
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CAMLAnnual · 4 paymentsAll CAML payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 11, 2023 $0.02; Dec 27, 2023 $0.02; Dec 12, 2024 $0.02; Dec 11, 2025 $0.00035. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

CAML vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CAML 14.7%JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CAML 0.86JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CAML −21.1%since Aug 2023JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CAML 1.10JUSA 0.98

CAML and JUSA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CAMLCvsGUSEA

    Congress Large Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CAMLCvsLRGCA

    Congress Large Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CAMLCvsFELGA

    Congress Large Cap Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.