CNRG ranks 3rd and PBW 8th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
CNRG vs PBW
CNRG −0.18pt a year
0.45%0.63%
PBW 63.4×the volume
9.06K574K
CNRG +14.6pt
−5.7%−20.3%
CNRG vs PBW Performance
−25.4%−67.8%
- CNRG 0.45%, better
- PBW 0.63%
- CNRG $163M
- PBW $287M
- CNRG −23.2%
- PBW −23.2%
- CNRG 1.66%
- PBW 2.65%, better
- CNRG 40
- PBW 74
- CNRG 9.06K sh
- PBW 574K sh, better
- CNRG $78.65
- PBW $25.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CNRG | PBW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | D30 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | B57 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | A79 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B67 | A82Higher |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. CNRG and PBW are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CNRGB
PBWC
In short
CNRG A focused read on clean power: about 40 global stocks tracked to an S&P Kensho index, at a fee below the clean-energy midpoint. Small fund, sharp mandate, one of the stronger builds in the theme.
PBW The original clean energy ETF, listed back in 2005. Its index weights names evenly within each sector and caps any one stock at 4% at the quarterly rebalance, so small pure-plays get real say. Costs 0.63%, near the category median.
Stated mandate
CNRG The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index before fees and expenses.
PBW The fund seeks to track the investment results of the WilderHill Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses. It normally invests at least 90% of total assets in common stocks comprising the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CNRG vs PBW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CNRG vs PBW Cost
Overpaying PBW vs CNRG
$3,318
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CNRG 0.45%
$9,041
PBW 0.63%
$12,359
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CNRG | PBW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,128 | $316 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $4,311 | $1,183 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $12,359 | $3,318 |
- 0.45%CNRG, cheaper
- 0.63%PBW
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
CNRG 3rd cheapest of 16 funds
PBW 11th cheapest of 16 funds
CNRG vs PBW Dividends
- CNRG 1.66%
- PBW 2.65%, better
- CNRG $1.27
- PBW $0.67
- CNRG $0.36
- PBW $0.28
- CNRG Sep 21, 2026
- PBW Sep 21, 2026
- CNRG Sep 23, 2026
- PBW Sep 25, 2026
- CNRG Quarterly
- PBW Quarterly
Distribution history
CNRG vs PBW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CNRG
- PBW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CNRG 34.4%, betterPBW 38.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- CNRG 0.31, betterPBW 0.13
- Worst fall
- CNRG −59.2%, betterPBW −84.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CNRG 1.87PBW 2.10
CNRG and PBW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
