Skip to content

IBAT vs PBW

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

IBATBNasdaq

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

PBWCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

IBAT −0.16pt a year

IBAT0.47%PBW0.63%

Avg volume · 30D

PBW 24.2×the volume

IBAT23.8KPBW574K

IBAT vs PBW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.3%IBAT−23.2%PBW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. IBAT +13.3%. PBW −23.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IBAT 0.47%, better
PBW 0.63%
Fund size
IBAT $56M
PBW $287M
1Y total return
IBAT +13.3%, better
PBW −23.2%
Yield (12M)
IBAT 0.84%
PBW 2.65%, better
Holdings
IBAT 97
PBW 74
Avg volume (30D)
IBAT 23.8K sh
PBW 574K sh, better
NAV per share
IBAT $35.92
PBW $25.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IBAT: Cost 83, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 55, Durability 36. PBW: Cost 30, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 87, Holdings 82, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for IBAT, PBW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIBATPBW
Cost30% weightA83HigherD30
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherF19
Tradability15% weightD37A87Higher
Holdings10% weightB55A82Higher
Durability5% weightD36A82Higher

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IBAT and PBW are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

IBAT ranks 4th and PBW 8th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BIBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BFANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 7CACESALPS Clean Energy ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 8CPBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETFScore 49
  8. Rank 9CVCLNVirtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IBATBiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

PBWCInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

In short

IBAT Most EV funds buy carmakers. IBAT drops a layer down the supply chain to the batteries, hydrogen, fuel cells and storage materials underneath, tracking a global STOXX index at a fee that undercuts much of its thematic peer group.

PBW The original clean energy ETF, listed back in 2005. Its index weights names evenly within each sector and caps any one stock at 4% at the quarterly rebalance, so small pure-plays get real say. Costs 0.63%, near the category median.

Stated mandate

IBAT The fund seeks to track an index of global companies involved in battery technologies, hydrogen, fuel cells, and other energy-storage solutions. It provides targeted exposure to companies supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy.

PBW The fund seeks to track the investment results of the WilderHill Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses. It normally invests at least 90% of total assets in common stocks comprising the index.

Why people hold it

  • IBAT 0.47% a year, cheaper than Global X's DRIV (0.68%) and Amplify's BATT (0.59%).
  • Buys the storage layer, not the showroom: battery technology, hydrogen, fuel cells and the materials that feed them.ishares.com
  • Global mandate, roughly 80 holdings: miners, chemical firms and equipment makers a US large-cap index never touches.
  • Sits in the upper tier of its battery and EV thematic group on our review.
  • PBW Listed in March 2005, it is the elder of the clean energy group, with two decades of history across the theme's booms and busts.
  • Modified equal-dollar weighting: holdings sit evenly within their sector and no single name may exceed 4% at the quarterly rebalance, so a few giants cannot run the show.wildershares.com
  • About 70 US-listed clean energy names, with the index reset every March, June, September and December, which trims the quarter's winners and re-ups the laggards.wildershares.com
  • One of the more actively traded funds in its category, and it pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • IBAT One theme, one supply chain. Battery and materials demand drives the whole basket in the same direction at the same time.
  • BlackRock applies business involvement screens, so the portfolio is a filtered slice of the industry rather than the full map.ishares.com
  • Launched in 2024, so the record is short and payouts come once or twice a year at most. Not an income holding.
  • PBW At 0.63% it lands near the category median, though index rivals run cheaper: ICLN charges 0.38%, FRNW 0.39%.
  • Equal weighting inside each sector pushes money down the cap scale, so small pure-plays swing this portfolio far more than they would in a market-cap-weighted clean energy fund.wildershares.com
  • The roster is set by qualitative calls at each quarterly rebalance (relevance to climate change, pollution prevention, technological significance), not a purely numeric screen.wildershares.com

Full IBAT profile⁠

Full PBW profile⁠

IBAT vs PBW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IBAT vs PBW Cost

Overpaying PBW vs IBAT

$2,941

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IBAT 0.47%

    $9,418

  • PBW 0.63%

    $12,359

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IBAT 0.47%
  • PBW 0.63%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PBW $12,359IBAT $9,418

Year by year

YearIBATPBWOverpaying
10$847$1,128$281
20$3,261$4,311$1,050
30$9,418$12,359$2,941

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%IBAT, cheaper
  • 0.63%PBW
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

IBAT 4th cheapest of 16 funds

PBW 11th cheapest of 16 funds

IBAT vs PBW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IBAT 0.84%
PBW 2.65%, better
Payout (12M)
IBAT $0.30
PBW $0.67
Last payment
IBAT $0.18
PBW $0.28
Ex-dividend
IBAT Jun 15, 2026
PBW Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
IBAT Jun 18, 2026
PBW Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
IBAT Twice a year
PBW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IBATTwice a year · 5 paymentsAll IBAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 11, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
PBWQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll PBW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.07; Jun 16, 2017 $0.15; Sep 18, 2017 $0.08; Dec 18, 2017 $0.03; Mar 19, 2018 $0.05; Jun 18, 2018 $0.17; Sep 24, 2018 $0.11; Dec 24, 2018 $0.11; Jun 24, 2019 $0.16; Sep 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 23, 2019 $0.18; Mar 23, 2020 $0.12; Jun 22, 2020 $0.05; Sep 21, 2020 $0.01; Dec 21, 2020 $0.28; Mar 22, 2021 $0.14; Jun 21, 2021 $0.26; Sep 20, 2021 $0.27; Dec 20, 2021 $0.55; Mar 21, 2022 $0.26; Jun 21, 2022 $0.32; Sep 19, 2022 $0.41; Dec 19, 2022 $0.63; Mar 20, 2023 $0.45; Jun 20, 2023 $0.26; Sep 18, 2023 $0.19; Dec 18, 2023 $0.19; Mar 18, 2024 $0.15; Jun 24, 2024 $0.14; Sep 23, 2024 $0.07; Dec 23, 2024 $0.21; Jun 23, 2025 $0.04; Sep 22, 2025 $0.08; Dec 22, 2025 $0.12; Mar 23, 2026 $0.03; Jun 22, 2026 $0.24; Sep 21, 2026 $0.28. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

IBAT vs PBW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IBAT 30.2%since Apr 2024PBW 38.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IBAT 0.48since Apr 2024PBW 0.13
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IBAT −28.2%since Mar 2024PBW −84.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IBAT 1.57PBW 2.10

IBAT and PBW in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IBATBvsICLNA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBWCvsICLNA

    Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsFRNWA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBWCvsFRNWA

    Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsCNRGB

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBWCvsCNRGB

    Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.