Skip to content

FRNW vs PBW

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

FRNWACboe

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

PBWCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FRNW −0.24pt a year

FRNW0.39%PBW0.63%

Avg volume · 30D

PBW 7.9×the volume

FRNW72.2KPBW574K

5Y return · a year

FRNW +14.0pt

FRNW−6.3%PBW−20.3%

FRNW vs PBW Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−27.8%FRNW−67.8%PBW

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FRNW −27.8%. PBW −67.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−80%−40%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FRNW 0.39%, better
PBW 0.63%
Fund size
FRNW $91M
PBW $287M
1Y total return
FRNW −5.9%, better
PBW −23.2%
Yield (12M)
FRNW 1.23%
PBW 2.65%, better
Holdings
FRNW 66
PBW 74
Avg volume (30D)
FRNW 72.2K sh
PBW 574K sh, better
NAV per share
FRNW $19.96
PBW $25.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FRNW: Cost 93, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 83, Durability 48. PBW: Cost 30, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 87, Holdings 82, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for FRNW, PBW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFRNWPBW
Cost30% weightA93HigherD30
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherF19
Tradability15% weightB65A87Higher
Holdings10% weightA83HigherA82
Durability5% weightC48A82Higher

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FRNW and PBW are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

FRNW ranks 2nd and PBW 8th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 7CACESALPS Clean Energy ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 8CPBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 9CVCLNVirtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETFScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FRNWAFidelity Clean Energy ETF

PBWCInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

In short

FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.

PBW The original clean energy ETF, listed back in 2005. Its index weights names evenly within each sector and caps any one stock at 4% at the quarterly rebalance, so small pure-plays get real say. Costs 0.63%, near the category median.

Stated mandate

FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.

PBW The fund seeks to track the investment results of the WilderHill Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses. It normally invests at least 90% of total assets in common stocks comprising the index.

Why people hold it

  • FRNW 0.39% a year ties the low-cost leader of the group (ICLN) and comes in under CNRG at 0.45% and FAN at 0.61%. In a theme where fees often run higher, that is real money kept.
  • Global by mandate, not US-only. The index reaches clean energy companies worldwide, so the fund follows the industry rather than one country's subsidy calendar.
  • A plain index fund, not a stock-picking bet: it aims to track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees, so what you own is spelled out in the methodology.
  • One of the stronger builds in a crowded clean energy shelf on our review, with the low fee and a spread-out portfolio doing the heavy lifting. Pays quarterly.
  • PBW Listed in March 2005, it is the elder of the clean energy group, with two decades of history across the theme's booms and busts.
  • Modified equal-dollar weighting: holdings sit evenly within their sector and no single name may exceed 4% at the quarterly rebalance, so a few giants cannot run the show.wildershares.com
  • About 70 US-listed clean energy names, with the index reset every March, June, September and December, which trims the quarter's winners and re-ups the laggards.wildershares.com
  • One of the more actively traded funds in its category, and it pays distributions quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FRNW One theme, one industry. Clean energy names swing with interest rates, policy shifts, and equipment prices, so the ride is far choppier than a broad market fund.
  • Roughly 60 stocks. That is focused enough that a handful of names and a couple of countries carry real weight in the outcome.
  • Not one of the giants. A mid-size asset base and moderate trading activity can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the category's most heavily traded funds.
  • PBW At 0.63% it lands near the category median, though index rivals run cheaper: ICLN charges 0.38%, FRNW 0.39%.
  • Equal weighting inside each sector pushes money down the cap scale, so small pure-plays swing this portfolio far more than they would in a market-cap-weighted clean energy fund.wildershares.com
  • The roster is set by qualitative calls at each quarterly rebalance (relevance to climate change, pollution prevention, technological significance), not a purely numeric screen.wildershares.com

Full FRNW profile⁠

Full PBW profile⁠

FRNW vs PBW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FRNW vs PBW Cost

Overpaying PBW vs FRNW

$4,461

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FRNW 0.39%

    $7,898

  • PBW 0.63%

    $12,359

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FRNW 0.39%
  • PBW 0.63%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PBW $12,359FRNW $7,898

Year by year

YearFRNWPBWOverpaying
10$705$1,128$423
20$2,725$4,311$1,586
30$7,898$12,359$4,461

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%FRNW, cheaper
  • 0.63%PBW
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds

PBW 11th cheapest of 16 funds

FRNW vs PBW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FRNW 1.23%
PBW 2.65%, better
Payout (12M)
FRNW $0.24
PBW $0.67
Last payment
FRNW $0.05
PBW $0.28
Ex-dividend
FRNW Sep 18, 2026
PBW Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FRNW Sep 22, 2026
PBW Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
FRNW Quarterly
PBW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FRNWQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll FRNW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2021 $0.01; Mar 18, 2022 $0.02; Jun 17, 2022 $0.09; Sep 16, 2022 $0.03; Dec 16, 2022 $0.01; Mar 17, 2023 $0.03; Jun 16, 2023 $0.10; Sep 15, 2023 $0.07; Dec 15, 2023 $0.03; Mar 15, 2024 $0.02; Jun 21, 2024 $0.10; Sep 20, 2024 $0.06; Dec 20, 2024 $0.02; Mar 21, 2025 $0.01; Jun 20, 2025 $0.12; Sep 19, 2025 $0.08; Dec 19, 2025 $0.04; Mar 20, 2026 $0.02; Jun 18, 2026 $0.14; Sep 18, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
PBWQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll PBW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 37 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.07; Jun 16, 2017 $0.15; Sep 18, 2017 $0.08; Dec 18, 2017 $0.03; Mar 19, 2018 $0.05; Jun 18, 2018 $0.17; Sep 24, 2018 $0.11; Dec 24, 2018 $0.11; Jun 24, 2019 $0.16; Sep 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 23, 2019 $0.18; Mar 23, 2020 $0.12; Jun 22, 2020 $0.05; Sep 21, 2020 $0.01; Dec 21, 2020 $0.28; Mar 22, 2021 $0.14; Jun 21, 2021 $0.26; Sep 20, 2021 $0.27; Dec 20, 2021 $0.55; Mar 21, 2022 $0.26; Jun 21, 2022 $0.32; Sep 19, 2022 $0.41; Dec 19, 2022 $0.63; Mar 20, 2023 $0.45; Jun 20, 2023 $0.26; Sep 18, 2023 $0.19; Dec 18, 2023 $0.19; Mar 18, 2024 $0.15; Jun 24, 2024 $0.14; Sep 23, 2024 $0.07; Dec 23, 2024 $0.21; Jun 23, 2025 $0.04; Sep 22, 2025 $0.08; Dec 22, 2025 $0.12; Mar 23, 2026 $0.03; Jun 22, 2026 $0.24; Sep 21, 2026 $0.28. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FRNW vs PBW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FRNW
  • PBW
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PBW −84.5% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−80%−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FRNW 27.0%, betterPBW 38.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FRNW 0.44, betterPBW 0.13
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FRNW −59.4%, betterPBW −84.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FRNW 1.53PBW 2.10

Popular comparisons

  • FRNWAvsICLNA

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBWCvsICLNA

    Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsCNRGB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBWCvsCNRGB

    Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FRNWAvsIBATB

    Fidelity Clean Energy ETF · iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PBWCvsIBATB

    Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF · iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.