FRNW ranks 2nd and PBW 8th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
FRNW vs PBW
FRNW −0.24pt a year
0.39%0.63%
PBW 7.9×the volume
72.2K574K
FRNW +14.0pt
−6.3%−20.3%
FRNW vs PBW Performance
−27.8%−67.8%
- FRNW 0.39%, better
- PBW 0.63%
- FRNW $91M
- PBW $287M
- FRNW −5.9%, better
- PBW −23.2%
- FRNW 1.23%
- PBW 2.65%, better
- FRNW 66
- PBW 74
- FRNW 72.2K sh
- PBW 574K sh, better
- FRNW $19.96
- PBW $25.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FRNW | PBW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | D30 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | B65 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | A83Higher | A82 |
| Durability | C48 | A82Higher |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. FRNW and PBW are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FRNWA
PBWC
In short
FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.
PBW The original clean energy ETF, listed back in 2005. Its index weights names evenly within each sector and caps any one stock at 4% at the quarterly rebalance, so small pure-plays get real say. Costs 0.63%, near the category median.
Stated mandate
FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.
PBW The fund seeks to track the investment results of the WilderHill Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses. It normally invests at least 90% of total assets in common stocks comprising the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FRNW vs PBW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FRNW vs PBW Cost
Overpaying PBW vs FRNW
$4,461
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FRNW 0.39%
$7,898
PBW 0.63%
$12,359
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FRNW | PBW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,128 | $423 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,311 | $1,586 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $12,359 | $4,461 |
- 0.39%FRNW, cheaper
- 0.63%PBW
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
PBW 11th cheapest of 16 funds
FRNW vs PBW Dividends
- FRNW 1.23%
- PBW 2.65%, better
- FRNW $0.24
- PBW $0.67
- FRNW $0.05
- PBW $0.28
- FRNW Sep 18, 2026
- PBW Sep 21, 2026
- FRNW Sep 22, 2026
- PBW Sep 25, 2026
- FRNW Quarterly
- PBW Quarterly
Distribution history
FRNW vs PBW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FRNW
- PBW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FRNW 27.0%, betterPBW 38.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FRNW 0.44, betterPBW 0.13
- Worst fall
- FRNW −59.4%, betterPBW −84.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FRNW 1.53PBW 2.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.