Skip to content

FMAT vs SLX

Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

FMATBNYSE Arca

VanEck Steel ETF

SLXDNYSE Arca

Overlap

8.3%by weight

Expense ratio

FMAT −0.47pt a year

FMAT0.08%SLX0.55%

Avg volume · 30D

FMAT 3.0×the volume

FMAT54KSLX17.7K

10Y return · a year

SLX +4.1pt

FMAT+9.9%SLX+14.0%

FMAT vs SLX Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+30.9%FMAT+117.3%SLX

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. FMAT +30.9%. SLX +117.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%150%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FMAT 0.08%, better
SLX 0.55%
Fund size
FMAT $599M
SLX $146M
1Y total return
FMAT +21.9%
SLX +29.6%, better
Yield (12M)
FMAT 1.37%, better
SLX 1.32%
Holdings
FMAT 107
SLX 42
Avg volume (30D)
FMAT 54K sh, better
SLX 17.7K sh
NAV per share
FMAT $59.75
SLX $96.45
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FMAT: Cost 95, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 45, Durability 52. SLX: Cost 16, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings 61, Durability 44.
Pillar letters and Scores for FMAT, SLX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFMATSLX
Cost30% weightA95HigherF16
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB55HigherC52
Tradability15% weightC54HigherD30
Holdings10% weightC45B61Higher
Durability5% weightC52HigherC44

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FMAT and SLX are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

FMAT ranks 2nd and SLX 13th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2BFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BVAWVanguard Materials ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 12DWOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETFScore 35
  5. Rank 13DSLXVanEck Steel ETFScore 34
  6. Rank 14FMETLSprott Active Metals & Miners ETFScore 17

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FMATBFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

SLXDVanEck Steel ETF

In short

FMAT The whole US materials sector in one cheap wrapper: chemicals, industrial gases, miners and packagers, roughly 120 names spanning large down to small caps, for 0.08% a year. Fidelity has run it since 2013.

SLX Most materials funds hand you chemicals, paint and packaging. SLX skips all that for steel alone: roughly 40 mills and miners worldwide, tracked by index since 2006.

Stated mandate

FMAT The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index.

SLX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Steel Index, representing companies involved in the global steel segment.

Why people hold it

  • FMAT Costs 0.08% a year, tied with XLB for the lowest fee among materials ETFs and a fraction of what the typical fund in the group charges.
  • Tracks MSCI's investable-market index, so the basket reaches past the mega caps into mid and small caps: roughly 120 holdings, not a dozen giants.fidelity.com
  • Does what the label says. Its returns have hugged its stated MSCI materials index, one of the stronger index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2013 with a multi-hundred-million-dollar asset base and quarterly distributions.
  • SLX Pure steel, not diluted. It tracks the MarketVector Global Steel Index, roughly 40 companies in the steel segment, instead of a broad materials basket.vaneck.com
  • Global by design: the index reaches steel companies listed outside the US, so exposure is not tied to one country's mills.vaneck.com
  • Launched in 2006 and run as a passive index fund, it has carried the same single-industry mandate through multiple steel cycles.

Worth knowing

  • FMAT One sector, and a cyclical one. Materials profits ride commodity prices and industrial demand, so this can move a long way from the broad market in either direction.
  • US-listed companies only, so the big Australian, Canadian and European miners sit outside the basket.fidelity.com
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume leader, so spreads can run wider than at the busiest materials funds, especially in fast markets.
  • SLX The specialty focus comes at a specialty price: 0.55% a year, versus 0.08% for XLB and 0.09% for VAW on the broad materials side.
  • One industry, about 40 names. Results ride on the global steel segment rather than the wider materials sector, and holdings are spread across foreign markets.
  • Cash comes back once or twice a year, not monthly, and the fund sits on the smaller, moderately traded end of its category.

Full FMAT profile⁠

Full SLX profile⁠

FMAT vs SLX Holdings

How FMAT and SLX differ

Overlap by weight

8.3%

Shared holdings make up 22.6% of SLX and 8.3% of FMAT.

Level by level

  • Holdings6 in both8.3%
  • Countryby domicile35.2%
  • Sector5 Sectors89.4%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in FMAT and SLX, widest gap first
SectorMore in FMATMore in SLXGap
Consumer DiscretionaryFMAT +10.0 points
EnergySLX +4.3 points
IndustrialsSLX +3.3 points
MaterialsSLX +2.9 points
Health CareFMAT +0.6 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FMAT and SLX, widest gap first
CountryMore in FMATMore in SLXGap
United StatesFMAT +61.8 points
AustraliaSLX +20.2 points
JapanSLX +9.9 points
BrazilSLX +8.0 points
United KingdomSLX +5.3 points
TaiwanSLX +5.0 points
South KoreaSLX +4.8 points
SwedenSLX +2.5 points
Other countries (9)SLX +6.1 points

Outside the US: SLX 70% developed, 30% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FMAT58.8%
  • SLX57.2%

Securities held

  • FMAT105
  • SLX39

Asset class

FMAT
Stocks
SLX
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in FMAT99
  • In both6
  • Only in SLX33

Only in FMAT

99 securities, 93.9% of FMAT by weight

  • Linde PLC16.32%
  • Newmont Corp8.76%
  • Freeport Mcmoran Inc5.85%

Only in SLX

33 securities, 77.4% of SLX by weight

  • Bhp Group Ltd7.21%
  • Rio Tinto Plc6.72%
  • Vale Sa6.07%

Weight gaps

All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FMAT and SLX, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FMATMore in SLXGap
Reliance IncRSSLX +4.02 points
Nucor CorpNUESLX +3.41 points
Steel Dynamics IncSTLDSLX +3.26 points
Commercial Metals CoCMCSLX +1.63 points
Cleveland-Cliffs IncCLFSLX +1.60 points
Worthington Steel IncWSSLX +0.38 points

All 115 FMAT holdings⁠All 42 SLX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FMAT vs SLX Cost

Overpaying SLX vs FMAT

$9,131

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FMAT 0.084%

    $1,773

  • SLX 0.55%

    $10,904

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FMAT 0.084%
  • SLX 0.55%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530SLX $10,904FMAT $1,773

Year by year

YearFMATSLXOverpaying
10$154$988$834
20$603$3,790$3,187
30$1,773$10,904$9,131

Expense ratio

  • 0.08%FMAT, cheaper
  • 0.55%SLX
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

FMAT 2nd cheapest of 14 funds

SLX 12th cheapest of 14 funds

FMAT vs SLX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FMAT 1.37%, better
SLX 1.32%
Payout (12M)
FMAT $0.82
SLX $1.32
Last payment
FMAT $0.20
SLX $1.32
Ex-dividend
FMAT Sep 18, 2026
SLX Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
FMAT Sep 22, 2026
SLX Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
FMAT Quarterly
SLX Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FMATQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FMAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.13; Jun 16, 2017 $0.14; Sep 15, 2017 $0.12; Dec 15, 2017 $0.14; Mar 16, 2018 $0.14; Jun 15, 2018 $0.16; Sep 21, 2018 $0.15; Dec 21, 2018 $0.17; Mar 15, 2019 $0.13; Jun 21, 2019 $0.19; Sep 20, 2019 $0.16; Dec 20, 2019 $0.17; Mar 20, 2020 $0.21; Jun 19, 2020 $0.15; Sep 18, 2020 $0.17; Dec 18, 2020 $0.17; Mar 19, 2021 $0.16; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.20; Dec 17, 2021 $0.19; Mar 18, 2022 $0.20; Jun 17, 2022 $0.27; Sep 16, 2022 $0.20; Dec 16, 2022 $0.21; Mar 17, 2023 $0.20; Jun 16, 2023 $0.21; Sep 15, 2023 $0.21; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Mar 15, 2024 $0.21; Jun 21, 2024 $0.19; Sep 20, 2024 $0.21; Dec 20, 2024 $0.21; Mar 21, 2025 $0.22; Jun 20, 2025 $0.22; Sep 19, 2025 $0.22; Dec 19, 2025 $0.21; Mar 20, 2026 $0.20; Jun 18, 2026 $0.21; Sep 18, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
SLXAnnual · 10 paymentsAll SLX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $1.09; Dec 27, 2017 $0.03; Dec 20, 2018 $2.18; Dec 30, 2019 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.83; Dec 20, 2021 $3.76; Dec 19, 2022 $2.88; Dec 18, 2023 $2.07; Dec 23, 2024 $2.08; Dec 22, 2025 $1.32. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

FMAT vs SLX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FMAT
  • SLX
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: SLX −33.6% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FMAT 17.3%, betterSLX 23.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FMAT 0.54SLX 0.71, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FMAT −25.4%, betterSLX −33.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FMAT 0.97SLX 1.27

Popular comparisons

  • FMATBvsXLBA

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLXDvsXLBA

    VanEck Steel ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMATBvsVAWB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLXDvsVAWB

    VanEck Steel ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FMATBvsXMEB

    Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLXDvsXMEB

    VanEck Steel ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.