Skip to content

SLX vs XME

VanEck Steel ETF

SLXDNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

XMEBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XME −0.20pt a year

SLX0.55%XME0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

XME 103.3×the volume

SLX17.7KXME1.83M

10Y return · a year

XME +0.4pt

SLX+14.0%XME+14.4%

SLX vs XME Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+117.3%SLX+122.4%XME

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. SLX +117.3%. XME +122.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%150%200%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
SLX 0.55%
XME 0.35%, better
Fund size
SLX $146M
XME $3.45B
1Y total return
SLX +29.6%, better
XME +5.7%
Yield (12M)
SLX 1.32%, better
XME 0.35%
Holdings
SLX 42
XME 39
Avg volume (30D)
SLX 17.7K sh
XME 1.83M sh, better
NAV per share
SLX $96.45
XME $93.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SLX: Cost 16, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings 61, Durability 44. XME: Cost 61, Risk 28, Mission 50, Tradability 95, Holdings 64, Durability 72.
Pillar letters and Scores for SLX, XME, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSLXXME
Cost30% weightF16B61Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredC50
Risk15% weightC52HigherD28
Tradability15% weightD30A95Higher
Holdings10% weightB61B64Higher
Durability5% weightC44A72Higher

Rank among Materials (Broad) funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SLX and XME are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Materials (Broad)⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

XME ranks 4th and SLX 13th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.

  1. Rank 1AXLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2BFMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BVAWVanguard Materials ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BXMEState Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 5BIYMiShares U.S. Basic Materials ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 12DWOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETFScore 35
  7. Rank 13DSLXVanEck Steel ETFScore 34
  8. Rank 14FMETLSprott Active Metals & Miners ETFScore 17

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SLXDVanEck Steel ETF

XMEBState Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

In short

SLX Most materials funds hand you chemicals, paint and packaging. SLX skips all that for steel alone: roughly 40 mills and miners worldwide, tracked by index since 2006.

XME Not the chemicals-heavy materials fund. XME holds roughly 40 miners and steelmakers on a modified equal weight, so a small copper name carries about the weight of a giant. Ore, coal and metal, since 2006.

Stated mandate

SLX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Steel Index, representing companies involved in the global steel segment.

XME The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index.

Why people hold it

  • SLX Pure steel, not diluted. It tracks the MarketVector Global Steel Index, roughly 40 companies in the steel segment, instead of a broad materials basket.vaneck.com
  • Global by design: the index reaches steel companies listed outside the US, so exposure is not tied to one country's mills.vaneck.com
  • Launched in 2006 and run as a passive index fund, it has carried the same single-industry mandate through multiple steel cycles.
  • XME Pure play on the metals and mining slice: aluminum, coal, copper, gold, precious metals, silver and steel sub-industries, not the whole materials sector.ssga.com
  • Modified equal weighting spreads exposure across large, mid and small caps, so the biggest miners don't set the tone for the whole portfolio.ssga.com
  • One of the more actively traded funds in its corner of the market, and a multi-billion-dollar fund that has been running since 2006.
  • 0.35% expense ratio, slightly under the median for the materials funds we grade, which is unusual for a narrow industry sleeve.

Worth knowing

  • SLX The specialty focus comes at a specialty price: 0.55% a year, versus 0.08% for XLB and 0.09% for VAW on the broad materials side.
  • One industry, about 40 names. Results ride on the global steel segment rather than the wider materials sector, and holdings are spread across foreign markets.
  • Cash comes back once or twice a year, not monthly, and the fund sits on the smaller, moderately traded end of its category.
  • XME Broad materials funds cost far less: XLB at 0.08% and VAW at 0.09%. They also own a very different mix, chemicals and packaging included.
  • About 40 names, many of them smaller miners, in one cyclical industry. Swings run wider than a diversified sector fund's.
  • The portfolio's fortunes track commodity cycles in steel, coal, copper and gold rather than broad industrial demand.ssga.com

Full SLX profile⁠

Full XME profile⁠

SLX vs XME Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SLX vs XME Cost

Overpaying SLX vs XME

$3,778

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SLX 0.55%

    $10,904

  • XME 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SLX 0.55%
  • XME 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530SLX $10,904XME $7,126

Year by year

YearSLXXMEOverpaying
10$988$634$354
20$3,790$2,454$1,336
30$10,904$7,126$3,778

Expense ratio

  • 0.55%SLX
  • 0.35%XME, cheaper
  • Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
  • Median 0.37%

XME 6th cheapest of 14 funds

SLX 12th cheapest of 14 funds

SLX vs XME Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
SLX 1.32%, better
XME 0.35%
Payout (12M)
SLX $1.32
XME $0.34
Last payment
SLX $1.32
XME $0.07
Ex-dividend
SLX Dec 22, 2025
XME Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
SLX Dec 26, 2025
XME Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
SLX Annual
XME Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

SLXAnnual · 10 paymentsAll SLX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $1.09; Dec 27, 2017 $0.03; Dec 20, 2018 $2.18; Dec 30, 2019 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.83; Dec 20, 2021 $3.76; Dec 19, 2022 $2.88; Dec 18, 2023 $2.07; Dec 23, 2024 $2.08; Dec 22, 2025 $1.32. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
XMEQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XME payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.04; Jun 16, 2017 $0.05; Sep 15, 2017 $0.06; Dec 15, 2017 $0.27; Mar 16, 2018 $0.05; Jun 15, 2018 $0.37; Sep 21, 2018 $0.07; Dec 21, 2018 $0.09; Mar 15, 2019 $0.15; Jun 21, 2019 $0.34; Sep 20, 2019 $0.10; Dec 20, 2019 $0.12; Mar 23, 2020 $0.08; Jun 22, 2020 $0.09; Sep 21, 2020 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Mar 22, 2021 $0.08; Jun 21, 2021 $0.09; Sep 20, 2021 $0.07; Dec 20, 2021 $0.08; Mar 21, 2022 $0.06; Jun 21, 2022 $0.21; Sep 19, 2022 $0.20; Dec 19, 2022 $0.35; Mar 20, 2023 $0.17; Jun 20, 2023 $0.16; Sep 18, 2023 $0.17; Dec 18, 2023 $0.10; Mar 18, 2024 $0.10; Jun 24, 2024 $0.10; Sep 23, 2024 $0.11; Dec 23, 2024 $0.06; Mar 24, 2025 $0.07; Jun 23, 2025 $0.09; Sep 22, 2025 $0.10; Dec 22, 2025 $0.13; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

SLX vs XME Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • SLX
  • XME
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: XME −37.3% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SLX 23.0%, betterXME 29.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SLX 0.71XME 0.79, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SLX −33.6%, betterXME −37.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SLX 1.27XME 1.32

SLX and XME in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SLXDvsXLBA

    VanEck Steel ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMEBvsXLBA

    State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF · State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLXDvsFMATB

    VanEck Steel ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMEBvsFMATB

    State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF · Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLXDvsVAWB

    VanEck Steel ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XMEBvsVAWB

    State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF · Vanguard Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.