XME ranks 4th and SLX 13th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
SLX vs XME
XME −0.20pt a year
0.55%0.35%
XME 103.3×the volume
17.7K1.83M
XME +0.4pt
+14.0%+14.4%
SLX vs XME Performance
+117.3%+122.4%
- SLX 0.55%
- XME 0.35%, better
- SLX $146M
- XME $3.45B
- SLX +29.6%, better
- XME +5.7%
- SLX 1.32%, better
- XME 0.35%
- SLX 42
- XME 39
- SLX 17.7K sh
- XME 1.83M sh, better
- SLX $96.45
- XME $93.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SLX | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | B61Higher |
| Mission | C50 | |
| Risk | C52Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | D30 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | B61 | B64Higher |
| Durability | C44 | A72Higher |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. SLX and XME are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SLXD
XMEB
In short
SLX Most materials funds hand you chemicals, paint and packaging. SLX skips all that for steel alone: roughly 40 mills and miners worldwide, tracked by index since 2006.
XME Not the chemicals-heavy materials fund. XME holds roughly 40 miners and steelmakers on a modified equal weight, so a small copper name carries about the weight of a giant. Ore, coal and metal, since 2006.
Stated mandate
SLX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Steel Index, representing companies involved in the global steel segment.
XME The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Metals and Mining Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SLX vs XME Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SLX vs XME Cost
Overpaying SLX vs XME
$3,778
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SLX 0.55%
$10,904
XME 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SLX | XME | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $634 | $354 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $2,454 | $1,336 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $7,126 | $3,778 |
- 0.55%SLX
- 0.35%XME, cheaper
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XME 6th cheapest of 14 funds
SLX 12th cheapest of 14 funds
SLX vs XME Dividends
- SLX 1.32%, better
- XME 0.35%
- SLX $1.32
- XME $0.34
- SLX $1.32
- XME $0.07
- SLX Dec 22, 2025
- XME Sep 21, 2026
- SLX Dec 26, 2025
- XME Sep 23, 2026
- SLX Annual
- XME Quarterly
Distribution history
SLX vs XME Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SLX
- XME
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SLX 23.0%, betterXME 29.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SLX 0.71XME 0.79, better
- Worst fall
- SLX −33.6%, betterXME −37.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SLX 1.27XME 1.32
SLX and XME in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
