VAW ranks 3rd and SLX 13th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
SLX vs VAW
VAW −0.46pt a year
0.55%0.09%
VAW 3.6×the volume
17.7K64.4K
SLX +4.1pt
+14.0%+9.9%
SLX vs VAW Performance
+117.3%+30.4%
- SLX 0.55%
- VAW 0.09%, better
- SLX $146M
- VAW $3.1B
- SLX +29.6%, better
- VAW +21.8%
- SLX 1.32%
- VAW 1.36%, better
- SLX 42
- VAW 114
- SLX 17.7K sh
- VAW 64.4K sh, better
- SLX $96.45
- VAW $227.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SLX | VAW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | A84Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | C42Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | B56 |
| Durability | C44 | A82Higher |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. SLX and VAW are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SLXD
VAWB
In short
SLX Most materials funds hand you chemicals, paint and packaging. SLX skips all that for steel alone: roughly 40 mills and miners worldwide, tracked by index since 2006.
VAW Vanguard's materials aisle in one ticker: chemicals, packaging and metals, roughly 120 names deep, for 0.09% a year while the category norm sits several times higher.
Stated mandate
SLX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Steel Index, representing companies involved in the global steel segment.
VAW The fund seeks to track a materials-sector equity benchmark through passive indexing and normally invests at least 80% of assets in the benchmark's stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SLX vs VAW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SLX vs VAW Cost
Overpaying SLX vs VAW
$9,006
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SLX 0.55%
$10,904
VAW 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SLX | VAW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $165 | $823 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $646 | $3,144 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $1,898 | $9,006 |
- 0.55%SLX
- 0.09%VAW, cheaper
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
VAW 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
SLX 12th cheapest of 14 funds
SLX vs VAW Dividends
- SLX 1.32%
- VAW 1.36%, better
- SLX $1.32
- VAW $3.18
- SLX $1.32
- VAW $0.78
- SLX Dec 22, 2025
- VAW Sep 23, 2026
- SLX Dec 26, 2025
- VAW Sep 25, 2026
- SLX Annual
- VAW Quarterly
Distribution history
SLX vs VAW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SLX
- VAW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SLX 23.0%VAW 17.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SLX 0.71, betterVAW 0.54
- Worst fall
- SLX −33.6%VAW −25.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SLX 1.27VAW 0.97
SLX and VAW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
