XLB ranks 1st and SLX 13th of 14 funds in the Materials (Broad) Category.
SLX vs XLB
XLB −0.47pt a year
0.55%0.08%
XLB 653.0×the volume
17.7K11.6M
SLX +3.6pt
+14.0%+10.4%
SLX vs XLB Performance
+117.3%+30.8%
- SLX 0.55%
- XLB 0.08%, better
- SLX $146M
- XLB $8.44B
- SLX +29.6%, better
- XLB +25.6%
- SLX 1.32%
- XLB 1.63%, better
- SLX 42
- XLB 27
- SLX 17.7K sh
- XLB 11.6M sh, better
- SLX $96.45
- XLB $51.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SLX | XLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | C52 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | D30 | A94Higher |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C47 |
| Durability | C44 | A81Higher |
Rank among Materials (Broad) funds
Same Category. SLX and XLB are both graded against the same 14 Materials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SLXD
XLBA
In short
SLX Most materials funds hand you chemicals, paint and packaging. SLX skips all that for steel alone: roughly 40 mills and miners worldwide, tracked by index since 2006.
XLB The original materials play. A 1998-vintage slice of the S&P 500's chemical, mining, packaging and building-materials names, run at eight basis points and traded in size all day long.
Stated mandate
SLX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Steel Index, representing companies involved in the global steel segment.
XLB The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Materials Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SLX vs XLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SLX vs XLB Cost
Overpaying SLX vs XLB
$9,215
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SLX 0.55%
$10,904
XLB 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SLX | XLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $147 | $841 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $575 | $3,215 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $1,689 | $9,215 |
- 0.55%SLX
- 0.08%XLB, cheaper
- Middle half of Materials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLB cheapest of 14 funds
SLX 12th cheapest of 14 funds
SLX vs XLB Dividends
- SLX 1.32%
- XLB 1.63%, better
- SLX $1.32
- XLB $0.86
- SLX $1.32
- XLB $0.23
- SLX Dec 22, 2025
- XLB Sep 21, 2026
- SLX Dec 26, 2025
- XLB Sep 23, 2026
- SLX Annual
- XLB Quarterly
Distribution history
SLX vs XLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SLX
- XLB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SLX 23.0%XLB 16.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SLX 0.71, betterXLB 0.59
- Worst fall
- SLX −33.6%XLB −24.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SLX 1.27XLB 0.82
SLX and XLB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





