FRNW ranks 2nd and RNRG 15th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.
FRNW vs RNRG
FRNW −0.26pt a year
0.39%0.65%
FRNW 15.5×the volume
72.2K4.66K
FRNW +2.5pt
−6.3%−8.8%
FRNW vs RNRG Performance
−27.8%−36.9%
- FRNW 0.39%, better
- RNRG 0.65%
- FRNW $91M
- RNRG $22M
- FRNW −5.9%, better
- RNRG −8.2%
- FRNW 1.23%
- RNRG 1.96%, better
- FRNW 66
- RNRG 39
- FRNW 72.2K sh, better
- RNRG 4.66K sh
- FRNW $19.96
- RNRG $30.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FRNW | RNRG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F20 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | D32 |
| Durability | C48Higher | D34 |
Rank among Clean Energy funds
Same Category. FRNW and RNRG are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FRNWA
RNRGD
In short
FRNW Fidelity wrote its own clean energy index, then priced the fund at 0.39% a year, matching the category's cheapest heavyweights and undercutting most rivals. Roughly 60 global stocks: solar, wind, and the grid gear behind them.
RNRG Most clean-energy funds buy the factories. RNRG buys the power plants: roughly 40 global companies that generate and sell renewable electricity. A utility-flavored take on the theme, running since 2015.
Stated mandate
FRNW The fund seeks returns that generally track the Fidelity Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses.
RNRG The fund seeks investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FRNW vs RNRG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FRNW vs RNRG Cost
Overpaying RNRG vs FRNW
$4,819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FRNW 0.39%
$7,898
RNRG 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FRNW | RNRG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,163 | $458 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,440 | $1,715 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $12,717 | $4,819 |
- 0.39%FRNW, cheaper
- 0.65%RNRG
- Middle half of Clean Energy funds
- Median 0.59%
FRNW 2nd cheapest of 16 funds
RNRG 13th cheapest of 16 funds
FRNW vs RNRG Dividends
- FRNW 1.23%
- RNRG 1.96%, better
- FRNW $0.24
- RNRG $0.59
- FRNW $0.05
- RNRG $0.21
- FRNW Sep 18, 2026
- RNRG Jun 29, 2026
- FRNW Sep 22, 2026
- RNRG Jul 7, 2026
- FRNW Quarterly
- RNRG Twice a year
Distribution history
FRNW vs RNRG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FRNW
- RNRG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FRNW 27.0%RNRG 20.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FRNW 0.44, betterRNRG 0.07
- Worst fall
- FRNW −59.4%RNRG −52.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FRNW 1.53RNRG 1.06
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.