Skip to content

IBAT vs RNRG

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

IBATBNasdaq

Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF

RNRGDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

IBAT −0.18pt a year

IBAT0.47%RNRG0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

IBAT 5.1×the volume

IBAT23.8KRNRG4.66K

IBAT vs RNRG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.3%IBAT−8.2%RNRG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. IBAT +13.3%. RNRG −8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%30%40%50%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IBAT 0.47%, better
RNRG 0.65%
Fund size
IBAT $56M
RNRG $22M
1Y total return
IBAT +13.3%, better
RNRG −8.2%
Yield (12M)
IBAT 0.84%
RNRG 1.96%, better
Holdings
IBAT 97
RNRG 39
Avg volume (30D)
IBAT 23.8K sh, better
RNRG 4.66K sh
NAV per share
IBAT $35.92
RNRG $30.13
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IBAT: Cost 83, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 55, Durability 36. RNRG: Cost 20, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 19, Holdings 32, Durability 34.
Pillar letters and Scores for IBAT, RNRG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIBATRNRG
Cost30% weightA83HigherF20
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherB62
Tradability15% weightD37HigherF19
Holdings10% weightB55HigherD32
Durability5% weightD36HigherD34

Rank among Clean Energy funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IBAT and RNRG are both graded against the same 16 Clean Energy funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Clean Energy⁠

Category · 16 funds
See all 16 ›

IBAT ranks 4th and RNRG 15th of 16 funds in the Clean Energy Category.

  1. Rank 1AICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFRNWFidelity Clean Energy ETFScore 77
  3. Rank 3BCNRGState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BIBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BFANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 14DTANInvesco Solar ETFScore 36
  7. Rank 15DRNRGGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETFScore 30
  8. Rank 16FKGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETFScore 19

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IBATBiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

RNRGDGlobal X Renewable Energy Producers ETF

In short

IBAT Most EV funds buy carmakers. IBAT drops a layer down the supply chain to the batteries, hydrogen, fuel cells and storage materials underneath, tracking a global STOXX index at a fee that undercuts much of its thematic peer group.

RNRG Most clean-energy funds buy the factories. RNRG buys the power plants: roughly 40 global companies that generate and sell renewable electricity. A utility-flavored take on the theme, running since 2015.

Stated mandate

IBAT The fund seeks to track an index of global companies involved in battery technologies, hydrogen, fuel cells, and other energy-storage solutions. It provides targeted exposure to companies supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy.

RNRG The fund seeks investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • IBAT 0.47% a year, cheaper than Global X's DRIV (0.68%) and Amplify's BATT (0.59%).
  • Buys the storage layer, not the showroom: battery technology, hydrogen, fuel cells and the materials that feed them.ishares.com
  • Global mandate, roughly 80 holdings: miners, chemical firms and equipment makers a US large-cap index never touches.
  • Sits in the upper tier of its battery and EV thematic group on our review.
  • RNRG Owns the producers, not the plumbing: its index targets companies that generate and sell renewable power rather than panel and turbine manufacturers.
  • One global basket of about 40 producers, so operators outside the US carry real weight instead of a token sleeve.
  • Risk profile screens better than most of its clean-energy group, closer to contracted power operators than to boom-and-bust equipment makers.
  • Trading since 2015, so it has lived through the theme's full boom and hangover rather than arriving at the peak.

Worth knowing

  • IBAT One theme, one supply chain. Battery and materials demand drives the whole basket in the same direction at the same time.
  • BlackRock applies business involvement screens, so the portfolio is a filtered slice of the industry rather than the full map.ishares.com
  • Launched in 2024, so the record is short and payouts come once or twice a year at most. Not an income holding.
  • RNRG At 0.65% a year it prices above the middle of the clean-energy shelf, and broader peers such as ICLN and FRNW charge less for wider coverage.
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can be wide and size takes patience to work through.
  • Producers-only and roughly 40 names: it moves differently from broad clean-energy indexes that lean on manufacturers and tech.

Full IBAT profile⁠

Full RNRG profile⁠

IBAT vs RNRG Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IBAT vs RNRG Cost

Overpaying RNRG vs IBAT

$3,299

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IBAT 0.47%

    $9,418

  • RNRG 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IBAT 0.47%
  • RNRG 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530RNRG $12,717IBAT $9,418

Year by year

YearIBATRNRGOverpaying
10$847$1,163$316
20$3,261$4,440$1,179
30$9,418$12,717$3,299

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%IBAT, cheaper
  • 0.65%RNRG
  • Middle half of Clean Energy funds
  • Median 0.59%

IBAT 4th cheapest of 16 funds

RNRG 13th cheapest of 16 funds

IBAT vs RNRG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IBAT 0.84%
RNRG 1.96%, better
Payout (12M)
IBAT $0.30
RNRG $0.59
Last payment
IBAT $0.18
RNRG $0.21
Ex-dividend
IBAT Jun 15, 2026
RNRG Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
IBAT Jun 18, 2026
RNRG Jul 7, 2026
Frequency
IBAT Twice a year
RNRG Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IBATTwice a year · 5 paymentsAll IBAT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 11, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
RNRGTwice a year · 28 paymentsAll RNRG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 28 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Feb 7, 2017 $0.38; May 5, 2017 $0.38; Aug 7, 2017 $0.38; Nov 7, 2017 $0.39; Feb 8, 2018 $0.42; May 10, 2018 $0.45; Aug 9, 2018 $0.45; Nov 8, 2018 $0.45; Feb 7, 2019 $0.34; May 7, 2019 $0.33; Aug 7, 2019 $0.31; Nov 7, 2019 $0.31; Dec 30, 2019 $0.03; Feb 7, 2020 $0.33; May 7, 2020 $0.35; Aug 7, 2020 $0.36; Nov 6, 2020 $0.37; Dec 30, 2020 $0.31; Jun 29, 2021 $0.31; Dec 30, 2021 $0.21; Jun 29, 2022 $0.27; Dec 29, 2022 $0.18; Jun 29, 2023 $0.24; Dec 28, 2023 $0.25; Jun 27, 2024 $0.20; Dec 30, 2024 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.37; Jun 29, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

IBAT vs RNRG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IBAT 30.2%since Apr 2024RNRG 20.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IBAT 0.48since Apr 2024RNRG 0.07
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IBAT −28.2%since Mar 2024RNRG −52.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IBAT 1.57RNRG 1.06

IBAT and RNRG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IBATBvsICLNA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RNRGDvsICLNA

    Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF · iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsFRNWA

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RNRGDvsFRNWA

    Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF · Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBATBvsCNRGB

    iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RNRGDvsCNRGB

    Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.