RISN ranks 4th and LGH 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
LGH vs RISN
RISN −0.30pt a year
1.02%0.72%
LGH 1.6×the volume
23K14.8K
LGH +5.0pt
+8.4%+3.4%
LGH vs RISN Performance
+49.7%+18.4%
- LGH 1.02%
- RISN 0.72%, better
- LGH $578M
- RISN $70M
- LGH +3.7%
- RISN +4.8%, better
- LGH 0.37%
- RISN 1.05%, better
- LGH 418
- RISN 53
- LGH 23K sh, better
- RISN 14.8K sh
- LGH $64.59
- RISN $31.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LGH | RISN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A85Higher |
| Risk | D35 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | A95Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | A83Higher | A80 |
| Durability | A89Higher | B68 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. LGH and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LGHB
RISNA
In short
LGH A 500-stock US large-cap index with an eject button. HCM's own trend model can cut equity exposure to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, then waits for the market to close back above the line before buying in again. Fee: 1.00% a year.
RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.
Stated mandate
LGH The Fund seeks to track the HCM Defender 500 Index before fees and expenses. Its index generally uses large-capitalization U.S. equities but can reduce exposure through 70/30, 40/60, or all-cash positions as market conditions change.
RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LGH vs RISN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LGH vs RISN Cost
Overpaying LGH vs RISN
$5,055
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LGH 1.02%
$19,012
RISN 0.72%
$13,957
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LGH | RISN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $1,284 | $513 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $4,888 | $1,858 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $13,957 | $5,055 |
- 1.02%LGH
- 0.72%RISN, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds
LGH 31st cheapest of 46 funds
LGH vs RISN Dividends
- LGH 0.37%
- RISN 1.05%, better
- LGH $0.24
- RISN $0.32
- LGH $0.24
- RISN $0.08
- LGH Dec 16, 2025
- RISN Sep 25, 2026
- LGH Dec 22, 2025
- RISN Oct 1, 2026
- LGH Annual
- RISN Quarterly
Distribution history
LGH vs RISN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LGH
- RISN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LGH 14.9%RISN 11.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LGH 1.13, betterRISN 0.77
- Worst fall
- LGH −29.4%RISN −21.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LGH 1.17RISN 1.08
LGH and RISN in the news

Category Review
Tactical funds ranged from a 32.2% gain to a 12.5% loss

Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.