Skip to content

LGH vs RISN

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF

LGHBNYSE Arca

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RISN −0.30pt a year

LGH1.02%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

LGH 1.6×the volume

LGH23KRISN14.8K

5Y return · a year

LGH +5.0pt

LGH+8.4%RISN+3.4%

LGH vs RISN Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+49.7%LGH+18.4%RISN

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. LGH +49.7%. RISN +18.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%40%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LGH 1.02%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
LGH $578M
RISN $70M
1Y total return
LGH +3.7%
RISN +4.8%, better
Yield (12M)
LGH 0.37%
RISN 1.05%, better
Holdings
LGH 418
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
LGH 23K sh, better
RISN 14.8K sh
NAV per share
LGH $64.59
RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LGH: Cost 33, Risk 35, Mission 75, Tradability 95, Holdings 83, Durability 89. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for LGH, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLGHRISN
Cost30% weightD33A76Higher
Mission25% weightA75A85Higher
Risk15% weightD35C46Higher
Tradability15% weightA95HigherB64
Holdings10% weightA83HigherA80
Durability5% weightA89HigherB68

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LGH and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and LGH 12th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 12BLGHHCM Defender 500 Index ETFScore 60
  8. Rank 12BMOODRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LGHBHCM Defender 500 Index ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

LGH A 500-stock US large-cap index with an eject button. HCM's own trend model can cut equity exposure to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, then waits for the market to close back above the line before buying in again. Fee: 1.00% a year.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

LGH The Fund seeks to track the HCM Defender 500 Index before fees and expenses. Its index generally uses large-capitalization U.S. equities but can reduce exposure through 70/30, 40/60, or all-cash positions as market conditions change.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • LGH The exit ramp is the product. A trend signal, not a manager's gut, decides when the index steps down from full equity to 70/30, 40/60 or all cash, and re-entry requires five straight closes back above the line.howardcm.com
  • Self-indexed and founder-run: Howard Capital Management sponsors, builds and maintains the index itself, and the firm's founder has been the portfolio manager since the fund began operations in 2019.howardcm.com
  • One of the better-built options in a crowded tactical-allocation field of dozens of funds, with years of live record behind the signal rather than a backtest.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • LGH 1.00% a year sits above the category median fee, and well above peers like ENDW at 0.22% or PBL at 0.45%. That is active-manager pricing for a rules-based overlay.
  • Trend models move late by design. The index only de-risks after the market has already fallen below the line, and only re-risks after five confirming closes, so it can hold cash while stocks are climbing.howardcm.com
  • Equity exposure can come indirectly, through derivatives, other funds and leveraged ETFs, which adds plumbing most plain index funds do not carry.sec.govhowardcm.com
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full LGH profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

LGH vs RISN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LGH vs RISN Cost

Overpaying LGH vs RISN

$5,055

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LGH 1.02%

    $19,012

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LGH 1.02%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530LGH $19,012RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearLGHRISNOverpaying
10$1,797$1,284$513
20$6,746$4,888$1,858
30$19,012$13,957$5,055

Expense ratio

  • 1.02%LGH
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

LGH 31st cheapest of 46 funds

LGH vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LGH 0.37%
RISN 1.05%, better
Payout (12M)
LGH $0.24
RISN $0.32
Last payment
LGH $0.24
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
LGH Dec 16, 2025
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
LGH Dec 22, 2025
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
LGH Annual
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

LGHAnnual · 8 paymentsAll LGH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 13, 2019 $0.05; Dec 14, 2020 $0.08; Dec 15, 2021 $0.06; Dec 29, 2021 $0.0037; Dec 15, 2022 $0.20; Dec 15, 2023 $0.26; Dec 16, 2024 $0.21; Dec 16, 2025 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

LGH vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LGH
  • RISN
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: LGH −29.4% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LGH 14.9%RISN 11.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LGH 1.13, betterRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LGH −29.4%RISN −21.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LGH 1.17RISN 1.08

LGH and RISN in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LGHBvsENDWA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsGMODA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LGHBvsPTBDA

    HCM Defender 500 Index ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.02% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.