NTSI ranks 4th and RSBA 18th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
NTSI vs RSBA
NTSI −0.73pt a year
0.28%1.01%
NTSI 1.4×the volume
18.9K13.4K
NTSI vs RSBA Performance
+10.4%−1.3%
- NTSI 0.28%, better
- RSBA 1.01%
- NTSI $488M
- RSBA $53M
- NTSI +10.4%, better
- RSBA −1.3%
- NTSI 3.11%
- RSBA 3.43%, better
- NTSI 458
- RSBA 11
- NTSI 18.9K sh, better
- RSBA 13.4K sh
- NTSI $46.48
- RSBA $20.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NTSI | RSBA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | A82 | |
| Durability | A70Higher | D30 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. NTSI and RSBA are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NTSIB
RSBAD
In short
NTSI Developed-market stocks and a U.S. Treasury futures sleeve sharing one seat. NTSI is WisdomTree's capital-efficient playbook pointed overseas: the stock exposure and the bond exposure don't have to compete for the same dollar.
Stated mandate
NTSI The Fund seeks total return through international equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. WisdomTree presents it as a capital-efficient balanced strategy intended to provide international equity exposure with Treasury-futures diversification.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NTSI vs RSBA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NTSI vs RSBA Cost
Overpaying RSBA vs NTSI
$13,095
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NTSI 0.28%
$5,755
RSBA 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NTSI | RSBA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,780 | $1,271 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $6,686 | $4,710 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $18,850 | $13,095 |
- 0.28%NTSI, cheaper
- 1.01%RSBA
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
NTSI 4th cheapest of 19 funds
RSBA 15th cheapest of 19 funds
NTSI vs RSBA Dividends
- NTSI 3.11%
- RSBA 3.43%, better
- NTSI $1.45
- RSBA $0.70
- NTSI $0.01
- RSBA $0.70
- NTSI Sep 25, 2026
- RSBA Dec 29, 2025
- NTSI Sep 29, 2026
- RSBA Dec 30, 2025
- NTSI Quarterly
- RSBA Annual
Distribution history
NTSI vs RSBA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NTSI 12.9%RSBA 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- NTSI 0.99RSBA −0.18
- Worst fall
- NTSI −33.4%RSBA −6.2%
- Market sensitivity
- NTSI 0.93RSBA 0.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.