NTSI ranks 4th and RSBT 14th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.
NTSI vs RSBT
0.0%by weight
NTSI −0.73pt a year
0.28%1.01%
RSBT 2.6×the volume
18.9K49.9K
NTSI +11.6pt
+16.5%+4.9%
NTSI vs RSBT Performance
+10.4%+7.3%
- NTSI 0.28%, better
- RSBT 1.01%
- NTSI $488M
- RSBT $162M
- NTSI +10.4%, better
- RSBT +7.3%
- NTSI 3.11%, better
- RSBT 3.02%
- NTSI 458
- RSBT 15
- NTSI 18.9K sh
- RSBT 49.9K sh, better
- NTSI $46.48
- RSBT $19.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NTSI | RSBT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F17 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | C42 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A82Higher | F16 |
| Durability | A70Higher | B62 |
Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
Same Category. NTSI and RSBT are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NTSIB
RSBTD
In short
NTSI Developed-market stocks and a U.S. Treasury futures sleeve sharing one seat. NTSI is WisdomTree's capital-efficient playbook pointed overseas: the stock exposure and the bond exposure don't have to compete for the same dollar.
RSBT Most portfolios make you choose: bonds, or a trend-following diversifier. RSBT stacks both on the same dollar, using leverage to run a bond strategy with a managed futures strategy inside one ticker.
Stated mandate
NTSI The Fund seeks total return through international equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures. WisdomTree presents it as a capital-efficient balanced strategy intended to provide international equity exposure with Treasury-futures diversification.
RSBT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF combining a bond strategy with a Managed Futures strategy, using leverage to stack their returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NTSI vs RSBT Holdings
How NTSI and RSBT differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NTSI and 0.0% of RSBT.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Country6.3%
Sector
No Sector split for RSBT.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NTSIMore in RSBT | NTSI | RSBT |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | RSBT +88.2 points | 2.5% | 90.7% |
| Japan | NTSI +27.2 points | 27.7% | 0.5% |
| United Kingdom | NTSI +15.1 points | 15.9% | 0.8% |
| Switzerland | NTSI +9.0 points | 9.3% | 0.3% |
| Germany | NTSI +6.8 points | 7.2% | 0.4% |
| France | NTSI +6.6 points | 7.0% | 0.4% |
| Netherlands | NTSI +6.1 points | 6.2% | 0.1% |
| Australia | NTSI +5.6 points | 5.9% | 0.3% |
| Other countries (32) | NTSI +11.8 points | 18.3% | 6.5% |
Outside the US: NTSI 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- NTSI23.9%
- RSBT239.1%
- NTSI444
- RSBT6
Asset class
- NTSI
- Alternatives
- RSBT
- Fixed Income
Holdings
- Only in NTSI444
- In both0
- Only in RSBT6
Only in NTSI
444 securities, 89.7% of NTSI by weight
- Asml Holding NV2.89%
- Shell PLC1.81%
- Roche Holding AG1.52%
- Hsbc Holdings PLC1.51%
- Novartis Ag-Reg1.51%
- Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Gro1.35%
- Nestle Sa-Reg1.23%
- Sap SE1.10%
- Totalenergies SE1.07%
- Astrazeneca PLC1.07%
- Toyota Motor Corp1.06%
- Siemens Ag-Reg1.01%
- Allianz Se-Reg0.90%
- Commonwealth Bank of Austral0.89%
- Bhp Group Ltd0.89%
- Softbank Group Corp0.88%
- Advantest Corp0.86%
- Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Gr0.84%
- Recruit Holdings Co Ltd0.82%
- Sony Group Corp0.81%
- Banco Santander SA0.79%
- Ubs Group Ag-Reg0.76%
- Bp PLC0.76%
- Hitachi Ltd0.74%
- Unicredit Spa0.73%
- Abb Ltd-Reg0.69%
- Tokyo Electron Ltd0.68%
- Unilever Plc0.67%
- Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argenta0.66%
- Iberdrola SA0.65%
- Schneider Electric SE0.63%
- Mitsubishi Corp0.63%
- Mizuho Financial Group Inc0.63%
- Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC0.62%
- British American Tobacco PLC0.61%
- Rio Tinto PLC0.57%
- Air Liquide SA0.57%
- Airbus SE0.56%
- Itochu Corp0.56%
- L'oreal0.55%
- Novo Nordisk A/S-B0.54%
- Ing Groep NV0.54%
- Aia Group Ltd0.52%
- Dbs Group Holdings Ltd0.51%
- Tokio Marine Holdings Inc0.50%
- Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vui0.50%
- Zurich Insurance Group AG0.49%
- Bnp Paribas0.47%
- Cie Financiere Richemo-A Reg0.47%
- Safran SA0.45%
Only in RSBT
6 securities, 100% of RSBT by weight
- US 2YR NOTE (CBT) Dec2685.79%
- US 5YR NOTE (CBT) Dec2627.50%
- US 10YR NOTE (CBT)Dec2615.79%
- GOLD 100 OZ FUTR Dec262.47%
- NATURAL GAS FUTR Dec260.80%
- US LONG BOND(CBT) Dec260.12%
Weight gaps
NTSI and RSBT share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NTSI vs RSBT Cost
Overpaying RSBT vs NTSI
$13,095
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NTSI 0.28%
$5,755
RSBT 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NTSI | RSBT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $1,780 | $1,271 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $6,686 | $4,710 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $18,850 | $13,095 |
- 0.28%NTSI, cheaper
- 1.01%RSBT
- Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
- Median 0.67%
NTSI 4th cheapest of 19 funds
RSBT 15th cheapest of 19 funds
NTSI vs RSBT Dividends
- NTSI 3.11%, better
- RSBT 3.02%
- NTSI $1.45
- RSBT $0.57
- NTSI $0.01
- RSBT $0.57
- NTSI Sep 25, 2026
- RSBT Dec 29, 2025
- NTSI Sep 29, 2026
- RSBT Dec 30, 2025
- NTSI Quarterly
- RSBT Irregular
Distribution history
NTSI vs RSBT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NTSI 12.9%RSBT 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- NTSI 0.99, betterRSBT 0.09
- Worst fall
- NTSI −33.4%RSBT −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- NTSI 0.93RSBT 0.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.13%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.